BRICS Revolution? Not Exactly.

Think it's important to understand that the global capital is not being thwarted by bricks. It's not being thwarted by this transition to the global South because that's how particularly leftists, so called leftists, and liberals, and sort of your traditional anti colonialist, anti imperialist thinkers and speakers and academics, sort of the propaganda is, or the rhetoric is, that this is the global South rising up against the West, It's rising up against capitalism. It's rising up against American domination and so forth. That's not actually what's happening. This is a transition that is being engineered by the a national OCGFC.

It's being engineered by Global Capital. This is what they want to happen because they understand that this is what must happen. Alhamdulillah, this is beneficial to global South countries. This is beneficial to the formerly colonized countries. Mhmm.

It's also dangerous. It's also risky. It's not that this is a rebellion Yeah. By the global South countries. The original idea for BRICS was just a way of selling investment products Okay.

By Goldman Sachs. It was just a marketing tool. The idea the name BRICS was just a way of trying to sell investment sort of instruments Right. By Goldman Sachs. But it turns out that the the the the countries that were involved in that, Brazil, Russia, India, and China, South Africa, have agency.

Mhmm. Who knew? They have agency, and they could actually decide that, well, as a matter of fact, it is a good idea. Mhmm. And so they sort of, as you say, took the bull by the horns and have actually been developing this.

The international SCGFC want this to happen. They know that it must happen, and no one is trying to prevent it from happening. I think even at this point, the the neocons are not trying to prevent it from happening. The neocons are just trying to make sure that they still get taken care of. The the the neocons here, I mean, the military industrial complex, OCGFC, the nationalistic OCGFC.

They wanna make sure that they still get taken care of. But they're not trying to prevent it. So no one is trying to prevent it. However, they are very interested in what the outcome is going to be, and they wanna make sure that their position is as dominant as possible. So they will they will continue to try.

I mean, I think that, for example, the talk about a single Brix currency Mhmm. Is something that that has been floated, and that is actually advocated by the original guy. I forgot his name. O'Neil, I think, who who came up with the BRICS. Currency.

The the no. The the the the the title BRICS, who came up with the whole concept of BRICS for Goldman Sachs. He advocates for a single currency. A single currency is an incredibly bad idea, and the the the the the leaders of BRICS have recognized that. They've understood that what we can have is a a unified payment system Mhmm.

But not a unified currency. Unified currency has been disastrous for Europe. Yeah. And I think anyone can see that when you have vastly different economies within a block, you have to have different currencies. They they everyone has to have their own currency.

It makes much more sense for you to facilitate each country using their own currency, accepting the trade should be in the currencies of the countries that are doing the trading. And that's accelerating. That that's happening a lot. That's happening much more than it ever has before. I I think that what they wanted to do was to just replicate the Bretton Woods system Yeah.

In the Southern Hemisphere. Mhmm. They just want to replicate that. Just reverse it. Just switch places.

Flip it to where now the Global North would be the victims of that Bretton Woods system. Mhmm. And the beneficiaries of that new Bretton Woods system would be in the Global South. Mhmm. Just flip the positions, what we've had since 1945.

But alhamdulillah, leaders of Brixham don't seem to be going for that, and they're making own path. It's it's actually an economic alliance. It's an economic alliance, but it has It's a political. But it definitely has political implications. Okay.

And it's increasingly having taking political positions. Okay. Like, for example, when they had the Brits the the Bricks Summit, they they issued a statement about Gaza. Right. So that's a political position.

They're coordinated. And it's obvious, you can see very clearly the sort of political criteria that is required for you to be a BRICS member. Uh-huh. Yeah. Even if it's not explicitly stated, it's quite clear.

All of the BRICS countries, even India, despite the fact that everyone has always felt that India was a shaky wheel in bricks. Mhmm. Even even India had and and and even though India is, you know, we see it anyway on social media, a lot of Indian bots or Indian trolls or what have you who are very pro Zionist and pro, you know, Israel, pro Netanyahu and so forth. The government is taking the BRICS position. Right.

The government of India has towed the line, the BRICS line with regards to Gaza and with regards to Israel and with regards to Palestine with regards to eventual resolution and settlement to state solution and so forth. Right. The the official you can say that the official BRICS position is the Saudi Arabian peace plan of 2003. Yeah. Everyone is on script.

Everyone is on script, including India, including China, including Iran now, including all of the all of the all of the states. So this is this is explicitly a political position. Officially, it remains an economic block, but clearly, it's also a political block.