If there is no standard criteria for hypergamy, you don't have a theory

Assalamu alaikum. You notice what the red pillars do, the. When you completely disprove that there's any actual factual basis for the theory that women are economically hypergamous and that they choose their mates based on economic advancement, personal economic advancement. You know, the data does not support that at all. So once you when you prove that that's not the case, then they'll say, well, hypergamy doesn't just mean economic advancement.

There's all types of different things that a woman can see as attaining someone who is a higher status than her. It depends on her own personal basis of, of judging value. Well, then you don't have a theory. There's nothing there. If there's not a standard criteria for what makes a decision hypergamous, then you don't have a theory.

Then there's nothing there. It's completely empty. All you're saying is that women want to be in relationships with men that they value for their own personal reasons, which is what everyone does. Wallahi, it's so stupid.