The Urgent Need for Accountability: Why Article 6 Must Be Invoked

But what, should the citizens do? Would they, think this year would harm them, or should it set them free if the article six goes over?

Well, to be honest, I I I don't I don't personally find that to be a priority, in my concerns. I think that that we have to look at this Americans and and everyone else in the world has to look at this. The first question you have to ask, okay, there's there's there's many ways that you can look at invoking article six. There's many ways you can many points of view about how you can analyze, and evaluate what we're what what this campaign is about. You can look at it strategically, in terms of the extent to which it can promote, peace and security in The Middle East and elsewhere.

You can look at it strategically in terms of how it will isolate The United States, and limit their their ability to project power around the world and so on, like I was just talking about. That's one way to look at it, that's those are all correct, evaluations. But I think that the first thing, that anyone should think about, whether they're American or elsewhere, is ask yourself the very simple question. Do you believe that people should do what they say? Do you believe that promises should be, fulfilled?

Do you believe that, contracts should be upheld? Do you believe that rules should be adhered to? Do you believe that the law should be adhered to? Do you believe that there should be accountability for wrongdoing? Do you believe that there should be accountability when a contract is broken, when it's not fulfilled?

If the answer to that question if the answer to all of those questions or any of those questions is yes, then whether you're American or not American, just on the basis of having morals and principles, you should support the invocation of article six. Because America has, as I said, persistently and consistently and insistently violated the principles of the charter. So if you're a moral person, if you if you believe in in morality, if you believe in in principles of law and the the rule of law and international law, if you believe in accountability, then you should support it. And your question, whether you support it or not, shouldn't include how is it going to affect me. The only thing that you should be concerned about is your own convictions and your own morality and your own principles and values and whether or not you believe, that the world should be, operating according to a global consensus.

And whether or not, when a country in the United Nations, a country signs a contract, which is what the charter is, you sign a contract that you're gonna abide by the the the principles of that charter that you actually do it. If you're someone who believes that when you put your name down on paper, whether it's you as an individual or your country or your government puts their name down on a piece of paper and says, I'm gonna do thus and so, then they should do it. And if they violate it, they should be punished for that. This is a this is a very basic principle of order. It's a very basic principle of law.

It's a very basic principle of of, morality and maturity. So if you believe in those things, then you should support it. And and it shouldn't enter into the equation, how is it gonna affect me? Now with regards to how it is going to affect the the average citizen in The United States, I don't think that it will have a a huge effect on most of the, citizenry in The United States. There there there's a there's a a contingent of people, especially on the right wing, who anyway believe that the that America shouldn't be in the United Nations because they already, openly and, vocally don't believe in multilateralism.

They already believe, very firmly and strongly in American exceptionalism and unilateralism. So they don't like the idea that The United States should be accountable to the world and they think that America should be out of the United Nations anyway. So there's already a contingent of people who want, America out of the UN for their own reasons And the the reasons that they want America out is the same reasons, that we think they should be out because they haven't been a good member, which is that they don't believe in, multilateralism. They don't believe in the rule of law. They don't believe in respecting the other nations of the world.

So there already is a contingent of people in The United States who who also would like America out of The US the UN. There's a there's a the the only thing that you can think about in terms of what effect it will have on America domestically is the isolation that will result. The isolation how can I put this? The the the as we all know, the the American economy, is ruled by or is managed, by means of the military industrial complex, which means that America, for at least as long as the United Nations has existed, America has, fueled their economy by fueling conflicts around the world, which is one of the reasons why they want the United Nations in the first place so that they can manage the countries of the world and they can actually promote the opposite of what the UN Charter is what what the United Nations is supposed to be for, which is peace and security. They can use the United Nations to promote war and insecurity and instability for the sake of their own economic benefit.

So if they are out of the United Nations and they are restricted in their ability to use the United Nations and they're restricted in their ability to act with impunity and with unaccountability, then that would restrict America's ability theoretically to spread war and conflict around the world which would or could potentially have detrimental effects to their economy since they do run their economy by means of fueling conflicts around the world. But I would I would clarify that that's something that is very likely to happen anyway because as I said in the beginning, the owners and controllers of global financialized capital, as we have seen, are moving towards a deglobalization, policy and an and an isolationist policy of The United States. So it could potentially revive, for example, local manufacturing and the local economy because generally a country that, operates according to isolationist principles, develops their domestic economy. So it it's possible. These are these are all, you know, theoretical, hypothetical possibilities of how it might go.

But I will just repeat what I said in the beginning, which is that this shouldn't be a factor when you're talking about justice. You shouldn't say, I will support justice and I will support accountability and I will support, the law, the implementation of the law and the enforcement of the law, and I will, support measures that, promote peace and security if it doesn't hurt me personally to do so or if it benefits me personally to do so. No. You do it because you have conviction. If you're not Jewish, being pro Zionist, is fundamentally antisemitic.

It's fundamentally antisemitic because you're saying that Jews don't belong in my country. They need to be somewhere else. And we know that the Christian the the Christian Zionists, the only reason that they're pro Zionist, the only reason that they're supporting Israel is because they believe in their fairy tale ideology of the the end times and Armageddon that it will result in the slaughter of all the Jews. So if you're not a Jew and you're pro Zionist, you are deeply deeply antisemitic. And the Republican Party and the the core constituents of the Republican Party are deeply antisemitic, genuinely antisemitic, not the not the sloganeering antisemitism of the ADL that they wanna use it against anyone who's anti Israel.

No. But genuinely antisemitic that they really do have a problem with Jewish people. And I think that we're going to see real antisemitism, explode in The United States and throughout the West. I think we're going to see it absolutely explode, to levels that we haven't seen in the West, you know, since they're very they they they have a very long history of of real antisemitism. I mean, we have to remember that.

You know, as as as Muslims, have to be fair and and recognize that antisemitism and anti Jewish hatred is a very real thing, and it is something that the Jewish people have suffered for centuries. That's a fact. And they have suffered that at the hands of the people who are supporting Israel now, at the hands of the same type of people who are supporting Israel now. And I'm my argument is that there's no change in those people. They're not pro Jewish now.

They're just as anti Jewish as they ever were, and that's actually why they support Israel and why they support Zionism. Because as I say, if you're a non Jew and you're supporting Zionism, all you're saying is that I don't want Jews in my country, they need to go somewhere else. I'm affirming that I don't believe the Jews are safe or should be safe in my country and they need to go elsewhere. That's the that's the fundamental premise of Zionism, especially if you're a non Jew. That's the fundamental premise of Zionism.

So if they cut ties with Israel, I think that we'll see an absolute explosion of of real antisemitism in the West. And I think that we're already seeing some signs of that now. And then one of the one of the indications of this, for example, is that is how much news you're seeing even in the mainstream about IPAC that that that everything that's going on that that's going wrong is due to IPAC or APAC, however you wanna say it, the Jewish lobby. That's just scapegoating. We wanna put everything on IPAC, because we don't wanna take responsibility for our own actions.

We don't wanna take responsibility for our own decisions because APAC, the reality is APAC spends a fraction of what the defense industry spends in lobbying. They spend an absolute fraction of what the aerospace industry, lobby spends in lobbying congress. Their their actual influence financially is minute compared to these much larger industries who are the real beneficiaries of America's policy in The Middle East and the real beneficiaries of America's decades long support for Israel. But they're talking about APAC now, and they're talking about Jewish control of this and that and the other because this is just the old centuries old antisemitism rising to the surface. And I think that we're going to see it probably explode over the next few years.

As I said, first of all, we have to face the fact that antisemitism is coded in European DNA. It's absolutely coded in their social DNA, in their cultural DNA to be anti Jewish. It's it's from from even in their religion to be anti Jewish is very deeply embedded in them, which is why they even came up with the with the phrase, with the with the really paradoxical oxymoron of a phrase, Judeo Christian. Precisely so that they could cover up the reality of their history of hostility and aggression towards the Jews. The the the term Judeo Christian is is absolutely an oxymoron.

So this is something that is deeply embedded in them. It's deeply embedded in their culture. It's deeply embedded in their history. And I think that the the the genocide and the behavior of Israel, they have to find a way to disassociate themselves from it, disassociate themselves from the reality that they are 100% responsible for it, that they are 100% the only reason why the genocide is taking place. As I've said, it's it's an American genocide in Gaza being carried out by the Jewish brigade of American colonialism, American imperialism.

But they have to find some way to avoid responsibility because that's also encoded in their DNA to avoid accountability and and avoid responsibility and never take responsibility for their actions and their decisions and to always put it on someone else which is again why they're putting responsibility for the decisions made by congress on APAC instead of on themselves or instead of instead of upon the defense sector and the defense lobbyists and so on. They need to find a way to distance themselves from what Israel has done and what Israel is doing. And I think that their easiest knee jerk response to that, their their reflex response to that will be to hate Jews, to just explode in their hatred of Jews and say it's all these Jews. That's the problem. It's the Jews are the problem.

It's not us. If it was up to us, just like this is what they do with IPAC or APAC. They act like if it was up to us, we'd be pro Palestinian. If it was up to us, there'd be peace. But the Jews are just twisting our arms.

We have no choice. We're compelled. We're under compulsion. We're under coercion. No.

You're not. If you are, it's from the defense sector. It's from the aerospace sector. It's from the tech sector. It's from the financial sector and so on.

You're benefiting. The reason you're making the decisions that you're making is out of your own greed and is out of your own inhumanity. You can't put that on someone else. But they want to put it on someone else because that's also, as I said, that's also encoded in their DNA to always they they need to believe that they're moral. They need to believe that they're virtuous regardless of their actions.

And that's that's also even even if you if you if you wanna look at it from a from a sort of a more philosophical perspective, that's another reason why you need to invoke article six to finally teach these people that accountability is a real thing. Accountability exists. Being held responsible for your actions is something that you have to learn someday. Someday you have to learn that you are held responsible for your actions and that you're not gonna be able to for example, if we were to invoke article six, say, no. No.

It wasn't us. It was Israel. We have nothing to do with it. No. No.

It wasn't us. It was APAC. No. It's you. But they want to find a way to avoid it.

They wanna find a way to to still be able to feel moral about themselves, to still be able to feel that they're virtuous and good and decent and righteous people. So they will redirect all responsibility and blame towards the Jews.