Middle Nation Content Talks: Western Misconceptions About The West -- Session 2
Assalamu alaikum, everyone. So this time, I do not think I, inshallah, have to play the video again because we played it last time, and this is the second part of our discussion. So I'll just, inshallah, continue where we left off. I'll just give a short summary of what we are trying to tackle. Okay?
So, again, the West and Western civilization. Right? When we speak about the West, it's not just sort of geographical location. It is, like, located mostly America and Europe, but you have to understand this is, a psychological state. Right?
It's not just geographical. Okay? West is western in mentality, Western in approach, worldview. Okay? It's not just geography.
So keep this in mind when, you know, the West is gonna be thrown a lot, this word. So just to understand what it's about. Right? So the West, quote, unquote, you know, it projects itself onto the world as this sort of democracy of the you know, this epitome of free speech, right, of human rights, of equality. And then it portrays those ideals as universal truth.
Right? It says that there is no other way, basically, how you can view these things. Math way is the best way, and anyone who goes against is just basically wrong. K? And we can just summarize this as Western supremacy.
K? But when we try to somehow critically examine this perception, the real the reality is that it's all based on misconceptions. They have misconceptions about their own identity, about their own values, about their morality. And this misconception is even about the values that they portray. Right?
Because they tell you that we have all of these values, but when times get tough, they just throw them under the bus. Yeah. They abandon their beliefs. They abandon these all of these values that they proclaim. You know, there is no standard in this civilization.
Yeah. It is incoherent. So how can a civilization basically exist when they cannot even, between each other, decide what is right, what is wrong, what is evil, what is good, what is moral, what is immoral, what is righteous, and what is evil? And this is basically the civilizational failure that we are trying to address and trying to uncover. Okay?
That it's a civilization that is based on misconceptions. And brother Shahid in the video last time, you know, described it pretty amazingly. It's not a civilization. It's a hallucination. So they have misconception about all of these values.
They have misconceptions about morality, misconceptions about women, misconceptions about equality, misconceptions about democracy, about violence, about extremism, about free speech, about race, about liberalism, about like, really every single thing that they proclaim, they have some misconceptions about it. Okay? So last time, we tried to uncover all of these misconceptions related to how they view women, how they portray women in a society, what is their role, how they, you know, how they view equality between genders, all of these things. I think we covered it really much in detail last time. So inshallah, this time we will go on to part two, which will be related to the Western misconceptions about violence and extremism.
Okay? And this is a very important topic, and especially it's very closely related to the last video that our brother uploaded where he goes into this, you know, trying to sort of put some, like, equivalence between their violence and our violence. Right? This is suddenly the part where they're not exceptional. And, you know, usually, they portray themselves as exceptional in everything, but once you start talking about their history, about the crimes that they commit, then suddenly everybody does it.
Right? You know, we are all the same. We did crimes. You did crimes. We bumped people.
You bumped people. It's basically you know, we're just a country trying to stick to its, you know, influence. Right? We are trying to have some say in the geopolitical sphere just as any other country. But this is really not reality.
There is really no equivalence whatsoever. Okay? And we will inshallah inshallah try to uncover all of these aspects of violence that the West keeps on hiding sort of. Okay? And I would like to start, you know, that, again, the West basically frequently labels other nations and especially our Muslim societies as being violent, right, as being extremist.
Well, they are the ones who are peaceful. They are the peaceful civilization. They are the ones that are trying to bring the prosperity to the world. They are the ones trying to bring democracy and all of these things. Yeah.
But in reality, historically, and what we can currently see, the West is basically the biggest and the greatest exporter of violence. It is the one who has been mostly engaging in wars, in military interventions, in bombings, bombings literally in every part of the world since World War two. And even before that, they have killed millions of millions of people and predominantly, of course, in the global South. The other thing is that this is not just foreign policy, the mass shootings and the proliferation of gun violence in their own societies, in their own nations. It just serves to, you know, showcase this contradiction between their self perception and the actions that are actually happening.
So I would like to ask my speakers, you know, this narrative of the Western society or civilization being this peaceful and orderly society, how does this narrative collapse when we try to view it in the light of its historical and ongoing violence across the globe? Like, how can, you know, the West, which tries to pride itself on these values on these empty values, I should say, of freedom, of human rights, how can it reconcile these values with the violent interventions and interactions, its colonial legacies, the military dominance, while it tries to label other countries as being violent, as being extremist?
So I think we would start that whenever they they say peaceful or whenever they refer to themselves as peaceful, they usually refer to themselves as peaceful among each other. So they don't refer to themselves as peaceful. So they they they initially thought that the whole world revolves around them, around their own being, and their own existence. And so when you ask them, you know, is you know, are you are you guys peaceful? Are you guys are not are you guys worrying?
And so they would answer, no, we're not warring. We're very peaceful. Okay? Because the last time we had a major war was that, like, World War two or something. So that's the that's how exclusive they think they are from the rest of the planet.
That they think that if they're if they're not worrying with each other, then they are by definition peaceful. Because when they treat other societies, it's it's irrelevant. These societies are irrelevant. If we war with these societies, if we are made peace with these societies, they're not even worth elevating for our own run, if you say. So that's how it collapses immediately because they're very centered on their take on peace and war and on who they make peace and war with.
So that's the first thing. The second thing is that they were never really at peace even with each other because they've been worrying with each other for for for ages. Ever since they knew, you know, technology and and the Renaissance and and and all of that four hundred years ago, they've been constantly in war with each other, trying to dominate each other, trying to build empires and kingdoms in Europe. And then, gradually, they started to find out that we can't just keep fighting it ourselves for forever. We have to export our violence to the whole world because the whole world is ours for the taking.
So that's why it's it's it's contradictory. It's self contradictory to say that they were always peaceful by nature. They were never they were never peaceful by nature. They just exported their peace, their violence, and they shifted direction to the whole world instead of internally, and that's what happened. So that's why it collapses immediately upon thorough investigation in their own history, not the history of the world.
You know, the world has always been warring at times of war and other times there was there was peace. Their own history is so much more full of war than any other history. So that's why the narrative immediately collapses upon historical inspection.
This is such a good point. Like exactly. Right? It's as if, you know, yeah, like, as if they don't hate each other. Right?
You know, we are the ones who are terrible. Right? Even though they I mean, like, since the Roman Empire and even before that, they have been just, you know, murdering each other whenever they got the chance. Right? SubhanAllah.
Very beautiful points. Sister Iman and then brother.
Yeah. I just wanted to add on to what brother Omar said because like you said, amazing points. I wanna add on to both the points. So the first point you were talking about, they don't see the violence that they commit against people, especially from the global South, as violence. And so that basically collapses the entire argument, and that's something that we we've spoken about at length multiple times.
They justify absolutely every single action they commit against anyone by using different justifications for each. So you have white supremacy against people who are not white. You have saying, like, Latino people always do drugs. They always talk about Eastern Europeans as people who are not worth they're not worth anything. They they they are just certain people who like to do drugs and have gangs and mafias, all this kind of stuff.
They even refer to Irish people as not white. They refer to some white people as white trash. They refer to every single group of people that they villainize in a different way to be able to justify their actions. And so, yeah, I completely agree with what I just wanted to add that point. But then on to the second point, it's really, really important that you said that because even in the Quran, Allah said in the Quran in in the ending part of a 14 of says, and so you think that, dear friends, you think that they are together, that they're working together, that they're united, which is the word that they always use united, when in reality, their hearts are divided.
In reality, they want to fight each other as well. So, essentially, they fight everyone. They have violence against everyone, but within even their own circle, they cannot even be at peace with their own people. So I think what brother Amr said is actually really really important, and I do wanna thank you for saying that.
Okay, brother. Thank you, sister Imam. Thank you. Brother Amr, just continue inshaAllah.
Yeah. I mean, for me, what what the best analogy that I see when it comes to western behavior and jingoism that has happened throughout decades and maybe even centuries, I always look at the analogy of the American cop or the American police officer. You know? Let's say the American police officer stops someone on the road, he could be speeding, he could not be speeding. They would ask some questions, and if the person is naive enough, they would answer.
And then that cop would try to intentionally provoke the the driver so that the driver either reacts more assertively with varying degrees. So it can start from being the body language can change to maybe the maybe the volume of his voice can go a little bit louder to even trying to legitimately defend himself from the top trying to attack him. And after all this, the cop would attack him and say stop resisting, stop resisting, stop resisting. This is basically a summary of western hegemony and particularly American hegemony. It's basically this part.
It's basically this analogy where they always want to put you in a position where you end up being ticked or provoked or or having to be put in a position where you have to defend yourself in some way or another. They basically create the landscape and as I said before, the landscape and the conditions that gives them a strategic outcome that's in their favor. Just like what an American cop, if he wants to arrest someone does. He provokes, then if he once he succeeds, he escalates, and then once he succeeds, he escalates again until he manages to arrest that person. So that being said, what's the best thing you can do?
Normally, you what from the experience, from what I've seen from other videos of the American cops talking with drivers and these drivers responding and the cops leave is usually, you just don't answer the questions. Don't entertain it, you know. Shut them out of the room, you know. Pretend that they're not there, you know. And that's how things from what from our assessment seems to be going through that direction through bricks, where we are trying to live without needing The United States, live without needing the West. It's
gonna take time. It's gonna take, of course, some blowback, but it will definitely limit the the lever that that they have on the planet. So that's from my side.
Thank you, brother. Yeah. It's a great analogy. Mean, subhanAllah. And, you know, you cannot just see on it the violence or, like, the violent aspect, but also the extremist aspect.
Right? Like, you have cops everywhere. Right? Every country has, you know, police officers. They stop you for, you know, speed limit.
But look how extremist they are in their approach to their, you know, fellow citizens. Right? It's not just about being violent, but how extreme they can take it. Right? Like, you know, as if they are their enemies.
And it's really subhanAllah, you know, like, even in their own societies, it's not just even between countries, but even between the people who are neighbors. Right? They're extreme towards each other.
Yeah. Sound like can can you hear me? I mean, when we talk about this mentality they have, I mean, I I reluctantly admit that I sometimes follow American influences. And, like, recently, there was an incident of a famous Twitch streamer from, I think, Texas, Austin, the city of Texas, who made some very unfortunate remarks about Palestinians and, you know, Arabs saying that, you know, it's not a big deal if the Israelis are committing genocide in Palestine because given the opportunity, the Palestinians would do the same to to the Jews, you know, to the Zionists, and they come from an from an inferior culture to, obviously, the superior western culture. So essentially, you know, in so many words, he said that their lives are worth less than, you know, the the lives of western colonizers who who are Israeli Zionists in in Palestine.
And, you know, that kind of rhetoric is commonplace in in America. You can find that in New York Times, in the most eminent academic circles. You you can find that in, like, mainstream, you know, influencers rhetoric and, obviously, going going to the old continent to Europe. I mean, maybe you guys don't follow it very closely, anti black, anti Muslim, anti immigrant rhetoric is just, know, commonplace. And they have this view that their culture is superior to not just, you know, new Muslim culture, but essentially, like, white European or non white, like, no Western European culture.
So we are witnessing a genocide taking place. Like, of people are being butchered, innocent men, women, and children. And at the same time, these western supremacists are saying, well, you know, we are doing that because you would have done the same thing to us and our culture is superior. But, I mean, they they keep forgetting that, you know, the Ottomans ruled Palestine for centuries. And before that, we had, you know, various other Muslim rules.
There was no genocide of the Jews. There was no genocide of the Christians. I mean, you know, those communities coexisted on that piece of land. And it was only when the Crusaders took over that we would see, you know, a bloodbaths or or, obviously, today when, you know, the design is controlling. So they spew this rhetoric, which is not factual, and they use, like, fringe extremist Muslim groups who are not who do not represent us.
I mean, we we don't pay our tax money to fund those groups like like they do. We were not represented by them at all. So they use these extreme cases to to kind of say, you know, there's violence on both sides, but we are superior because we are, you know, we have liberal values and whatnot. And what really struck me is funny a little bit. That's, I I guess, another another point of confusion that they had.
The same influencer tool was bewildered that, you know, many cities or rather streets and many names of places in Texas have Spanish names. I mean, imagine the imagine the ignorance of that guy and of the culture that produces such speakers and such such rhetoric. They are completely ignorant of what is going on in the world, of what other people think of them, and how how much they they hated really across the world, and they're still they're still stuck in that old colonial mindset that we are better than them. Therefore, you know, superior human beings should should not feel bad about exterminating inferior human beings. And we know we know, you know, some of the recent examples from history, how that how that went.
So, yeah, I I just wanted to to mention that example. It is basically to basically portray how commonplace that is, how psychotic they've become, you know, their their entire culture, and what is considered normal in today's, you know, western even academic circles is, like, completely deranged and goes against human nature. So we we we shouldn't mince words when we speak about their violence and their culture. They're completely deranged. They are out of touch with reality, and they definitely need a reality check.
So yeah.
Exactly. Like and this is the point that brother usually mentions. Right? Like, their misconception about assigning value. Right?
That, you know, they assign value based on, like, who can beat the other one. Right? And by that, I'm basically superior. Like, if I can, you know, get you on your knees, I have to, you know, I have the right to do that, and you deserve it, basically. Right?
That's, you know, their approach. You know, subhanAllah, and as you mentioned, like, with the Ottoman Empire and different empires in the history of Muslim world, you know, you you have to understand guys that the Muslim was a minority even at the beginnings. Right? You know, the like, it's really crazy, right, when one sees the historical record of how societies live together, what was the approach to various ethnicities, to different religions, to different like, you know, subhanAllah, there is no civilization in the world who was more tolerant than the Muslim civilization. Yeah.
And, yeah, I would then try to navigate back to the what's the, you know, American experience of violence and extremism and how it started. But just before that, I see that our brothers here have their hands raised. So maybe MG first and then brother Omar, if you wanna add some points.
Yeah. Yeah. I'd like to add some points. So yeah. I mean, it's very evident and a lot of what the western centric narrative is used to paint us as extremist or as violent or as savage.
A lot of it is also pure projecting because, I mean, if we look at history, our own ex like, those that were amongst us that were extremists, they were immediately removed from any position of power and authority. For example, like, if you I I can't imagine if you have someone like Ben Gavir or Smotrich being interior ministers or finance ministers of of an Arab or Muslim country. I mean, we for the past ten years, we've been actually suppressing our we've been actually keeping our own extremists at bay to the extent that we to the to the extent that we are the ones losing our life more than them because of them. So while on the other hand, they're they're empowering and they are enabling their own extremists like Ben Gavir, like Smotrich, like Netanyahu, like also other far right figures with whether that's in Europe or The United States or or even some parts of unfortunately, parts of of Latin America that might be aligned more with the West. So this is a problem that they have.
It's not a problem that we have.
Yeah. Exactly. Like, I love this point. Right? You know?
It's as if we suddenly, the KKK was basically the way America approaches. Like, even that is more real or more realistic than comparing, you know, extremist groups in our parts of the world with our governments or our, you know, ruling and so on. Right? Like, take any extremist group in The US and, you know, they do not have little of them. Right?
If we can say it in that manner. And just say that this is The US approach to the world. Right? And there even you can be more close to reality than when you are with us. Right?
So yeah. Brother Amar, please.
Yeah. I just wanted to tie in this point with the fact that we have to be clear about we never hear in the West the term state terrorism, which is essentially what these guys are doing. Right? So they always mention terrorist groups, terrorist attacks, terrorist this and that. But we don't hear ever about they they haven't put it in their lexicon that states also can be terrorists as well.
Right? That terrorism can be at a state level, it can be official and it can be that systematic. And so, for example, France in Algiers, and I'm sure sister Eman knows all well about all too well about this. So when France was liberated from the German occupation after World War two, okay, the Algerians, because they were, you know, they they had this dream of thinking that the French after having suffered occupation like they themselves have been suffering occupation for decades, if not if not centuries, they thought that, okay, now the French government will give us our freedom like they have attained their freedom. And instead, the French government just bombed them and killed them on mass, massacres upon massacres to add to the already existing massacres that they had done to them in the past during the occupation.
So this is just to give you an idea about how how double speak works for those people. Like, they literally have the audacity to say that we were occupied by Germany and so we deserve our freedom, but you guys do not deserve your freedom even though we occupy it. It's it's it's breathtaking to hear them say that. You you can't you can't hear that and and and sit still. Brother Kramer, you wanted to say something.
Sorry.
No. I just wanted to say exactly, like, it's breathtaking. Right? This delusion that they are in. Right?
Like, look you know, again, let's just take it back, you know, couple of years. Right? You mentioned Algeria and so on. That was, again, a consequence of sorry if you can just mute your mic, please.
Sorry. Yeah. Sorry.
No. No. No worries. No worries. Thank you because it's in my speaker.
So, yeah, thank you very much. Yeah. Like like, let just take it back. Right? You know, this country, okay, you know, this again, it's basically, let's start with the enlightenment phase.
Right? You know, our brother once put it in a video. Right? Their enlightenment basically means that they went set out on a mission to extinguish the light everywhere else. Right?
And part of this enlightenment or, you know, couple of decades before it, they went to the great land of the free. Right? And what did they do? Right? So, you know, basically, this whole American society is a society built on genocide.
Right? You know, this is something that we cannot forget about. Right? They tried to shut down this conversation. They tried to, you know, turn the other way from it.
But
Yeah. Like, that it was in the past, and that's something something in the past. We shouldn't talk about it. Right? We let bygones be bygones.
Yeah. Exactly. But, you know, if you build a house on, you know, paper foundations, it's gonna crumble. Right? And you built your society on a genocide.
Like, how do you wanna turn away from this when basically your start is just built on the blood of innocent people? Right? Like, it's subhanAllah. It's crazy. Right?
Yeah.
I mean,
I don't know if anybody wants
Well, mean, not to mention the fact that that if you're going to talk about, okay, let's let bygones be bygones. Well, we might be willing to do that, but it's not gone though. It hasn't gone by. The bygone that you want us to call bygone hasn't gone by. It's happening right now.
Where's the change? This is what I'm asking. You know, they we always hear these atheists and Western, you know, the these Western civilizational, so called civilizational supremacists and so on, talking about the great enlightenment values and how religion, for example, is the is the source of so many wars and strife and so on. Can I introduce you to the history of Europe since the enlightenment? Are you familiar with the nineteenth century?
Are you familiar with the twentieth century? Are you familiar with the fact that there's been over 200 military interventions just by The United States alone in the last two hundred years? That's that's an a military intervention for every single year over the last two hundred years. And and and look at what you're doing right now. So tell me, where's the change?
Where I would we would maybe we would consider the option of letting bygones be bygones if it had gone by, but it's present right now. You're doing it right now. Just look around the world right now at what your countries are doing, at what America is doing, at what Europe is doing, at what the so called western civilization is doing in the global South, in Gaza right now, in The Middle East, in Congo, in Africa, throughout Africa, throughout Latin America right now. You're overthrowing governments right now. Where's the change?
You know? Where what where where was this so called enlightenment? You know? When when is the past going to just be the past? We're like I like I I I'm not sure if I said it in the video or not, but I've mentioned it more than one time.
When you have those you have those, those horrific postcards that they used to have, back in the, segregation days, post civil war days in Saudi. I post civil war makes it sound like it's much farther back in history than it really was. We're talking about the nineteen forties, nineteen fifties. Nineteen thirties, forties, fifties, when when they were taking pictures and postcards of of of families having picnics with African Americans hanging from trees. It was a lynching picnic party that they were having, and they were all celebrating it and having fun, and and passing it around.
And they were and they were sending African American children out to bait alligators. That, you know, now look at your news right now. Now look at just turn on your news right now, and tell me how it's how are you any different than your great grandparents, your grandparents, your great grandparents, your ancestors? Where is the evolution that you keep telling us about? Where is the enlightenment that you keep telling us about?
Because from what from from where we're sitting, you're doing exactly the same thing, you're acting the exact same way, you believe the exact same way, you have the exact same attitude, you have the exact same philosophy of the barbarians of your history. You haven't changed one bit. So like I said, maybe we could consider we could take it into consideration to let bygones be bygones. Just let us know at what point it's going to have gone by because it's happening right now.
Exactly. Like and, you know, this argument. Right? You know, we got rid of religion and now, Okay. So with religion, you know, you had crusades.
You massacred countries. You ate each other. Right? Great job. Okay.
So you got rid of religion, and what did you do? You massacred even more. Right? You used, you know, all kinds of new technologies to
massacre each other.
Right? And that collates world war.
Exactly. And and
and that Subhanallah.
Subhanallah, that's their argument. When you tell them, well, look at the body count of the twentieth century. They'll say, well, that's the technology. Okay. So you admit you've not changed.
Your enlightenment didn't make you more moral. Yeah. Their their their reasoning is if people if if we, the West, if we had had the same technology, 400 ago, then the body count would have been just as high as the body count of the twentieth century. Okay. You just told me that you never changed.
Yeah. Masha'allah. Brother MG and then sister.
Yeah. Exactly. I mean, they haven't changed they haven't changed one bit. And whenever sometimes when you even bring back this topic, it's like it's always they always say, but, yeah, yeah, we we we nuke Japan. Yeah.
But, you know, we had to end the war and might makes right. I mean, it's always it's always the might makes right. You know? Might makes right all the time until we are on the receiving end. Then it's a different then it's a different equation.
Yes. It's 39. Exactly. Like, exactly different equations. Suddenly, right, different different standards, different, you know, judging.
Yeah. That's that's as we go.
The the rules only apply when we are at the disadvantage. When you when you have the upper hand, then we'll have recourse to the rules. But when we have the upper hand, it's shock and awe.
Absolutely. And what brother Karim was talking about earlier saying that the foundation of The United States is quite literally death and declared to the native Americans, which is completely true. And then the kidnapping and enslavement of millions upon millions of people from Africa. Completely true. And the thing is, they always say, well, that's in the past.
That's the past. That's in the past. When it came to World War two, everyone was like, yeah. Never again. Never again.
Never again. They said never again, they did not mean never again we will kill anyone. Never again will we colonize anyone. Never again will we genocide anyone. What they meant is never again Germany will kill any Jewish people in a holocaust in this exact same fashion.
That's what they meant. They were like they didn't actually mean it as well. They were just saying it as a performance. It's a performance to say never again. And they teach us this in in in schools.
You know? Never again. We're never gonna kill Jews again. What about everyone else? You're literally killing everyone else.
I mean, it's not even just to do with the killing. It's to do with the enslavement and everything that they do. I mean, going back to France, they quite literally had a human zoo in 1994. That is thirty years ago. I have siblings older than that, and I'm only 20.
So it doesn't make any sense for them to say any of this kind of stuff. They quite literally kidnap people from the Democratic Republic Of The Congo. They take them to France, put them in cages, and let people come and watch them. This was in the nineties. This was in the era of the cell phone.
It doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Because every single time, they're like, oh, we never do this. We've never done this, and never again will we do it. Well, you're still doing it. Well, why?
You're still doing it to this day, Yani. Today today, they are killing people. Yesterday, they were killing people and so forth for literally hundreds and hundreds of years. Yani, not one day did they stop killing people. Not one day did they stop enslaving people.
They still enslave people. When we talk about the American domestic violence and everything that they have within their own country, when we talk about the people who are incarcerated within their prisons and everything, they are enslaved. They are doing unpaid manual labor. That is a pretty word for enslaved. Those people are still enslaved.
And so they will never not commit violence against anyone. They will commit violence against absolutely everyone because of this megalomaniac ideology that they follow. The the ideology that they need money, that they need power, and the only way to get it is through the taking and the enslavement of millions and millions and millions of lives.
I mean, the the the truth of the matter is that they say never again, and they say we've changed precisely so they can get away with doing it again while you're not looking. They they say it specifically so that you can be assured that they won't do it, and the only reason they're saying it is because they have every intention of doing it again. They have every intention of never changing. That's exactly why they say, oh, never again. We're we've we're a changed man.
We'll never do it again. Just so that you'll let your guard down and they can start doing it right away. Just like like like the school of the Americas, for example. We were just talking about it this morning on on one of the lives. The school of the Americas, which was a torture school created in The United States to to to teach a paramilitaries and dictators and torturers all throughout the global South that were puppets of The United States, teaching them the most heinous, disgusting, horrific torture techniques.
Then this school got found out and it got a lot of bad press. It got a lot of bad publicity. I assume that a
lot of the
people who were listening probably already know about it, but if you don't, you should. Then it was officially shut down in the year 2000, I believe. 2000. But it wasn't shut down. They just changed the name.
That's all they did was rebranded and changed the name, and they kept doing exactly what they've been doing already for decades. This is their pattern. This is their modus operandi. It's exactly like a sociopath or a psychopath. As long as they can get away with it, they'll do it.
And as long as you give them the benefit of the doubt, they will abuse that benefit of the doubt, and they will keep committing the crimes that they've always committed, which is again, I this isn't the topic of the of the conversation, the topic of the discussion, but this is exactly why we need to expel The United States from the United Nations. Because the only way that they could you can ever change their behavior is to hold them accountable. And the only reason that they've been able to get away with everything that they have been able to get away with is because they rigged that institution so that they could be above the law and never have accountability. Their hegemony is based exclusively upon their impunity, and the only way that you can ever get them to change their behavior is by depriving depriving them of that impunity and holding them accountable.
Exactly. And just before I give the mic to our brothers, I just wanted to say two points. Right? Like, sister Iman mentioned, you know, the prisons. Right?
When it was the Soviets doing it, it's called Gulag. Right? Then we have to condemn it. And in America, it's called a prison. Right?
It's just a normal thing. Right? No issue with that. The other thing is, right, like, when you mentioned the with the technological aspect. And so this is, you know, the progress.
Right? This progress of the western civilization. We are the ones doing the progress. Right? But when we started bringing it in, you know, the light of war and yeah.
Then it had that was the technology. Sorry for that. Right? It's not our fault. Is it you know, everything is just whatever suits the specific topic.
We just change it, you know, without any, like I I hope I'm getting my point across right. But, you know, the everything they, like, use as the values or there's something positive when it it can be used as something negative. It can be as a positive, whatever. Right? It's just how the situation goes for it.
Right? So yeah. So brother Angie?
Yeah. I mean, of course, when you when you when you when you look at the way, I would say the collective conscience work, it's it's it's it's it's remarkably insidious. I mean, you had you just had Anna Anna Lina, what's her name? Is it the foreign minister of Germany? I I don't remember her.
I can't pronounce her last name. I mean, she's a member of the Green Party, and she's and and she just went out and blatantly said, you know, that if there are if it's okay to target civilians, if it means that we eliminate, the quote, unquote terrorists. I mean, this is a genocidal statement by a member of the Green Party, which is technique which is technically the most progressive party in Germany. You know? So imagine what the other parties think.
I mean, is quite remark it's it's remark it's a it's a remarkable observation in my opinion. And when when you think like that, it's it's it's incredibly reflective of just, you know, how things have always been, you know. It's like when they keep saying, like, Germany, keep saying never again. It's like, for example, an abusive husband or an abusive spouse who beats his wife or she beats her husband or the other way around, and then they say, never again. Never again.
I'm not gonna hit you with the hammer, but maybe next time I can shoot you with a gun, you know. It's it's that simple.
Yeah. Exactly. It's subhanAllah. Like, you know, like, we just saw Yahya Senor. Right?
You know, where was where were the human shields? Where were the civilians? Where were the victims? Right? Who are who are you saving, Yahya Senor?
What what are you saying? Right, Ghani? This was the biggest explosion that they could have, you know, done. You know, he was on the front lines. He was battling.
He was alone there. You know, I couldn't see any civilians over there. I couldn't see any kids over there. You know? The only kids I can see is when you pump them to, you know, in flames.
Right? When you pump hospitals, when you pump schools, I couldn't see any Hamas soldiers having some kids with them. What what what are you talking about? Brother Amlan, please go ahead.
So, yeah, again, with the double speak. Right? So it's it's it's breathtaking how they they frame it when other people do it but when they do it, right? So they would say that, okay, Turkey, you know, they committed mass massacres against the Armenians. Well, when did they do that exactly?
Oh, after the state, after the nation state, which is your model of of governance. Right? That minorities should not be accepted within any nation state. And so that we will we we you have to do that because you have to have a homogenous composition of your nation state. Right?
But not in the not ever in Islam have has that been done. But look at what happened like three hundred or four hundred years before in in Spain, in Andalus. You ethnically cleansed Muslims from there. You don't have any any any Muslims who who can trace their ancestry back to the to the Andalus period living in Spain. I mean, not not not I mean, not technologically speaking.
So when they do it, they will say, yeah, it's it's bad. It's not us. It was, you know, just But when when we do it and we don't do it because we wanted to do it but because your model of governance compelled us to do it because we wanted to be better some in some cases. And so it's like you're Muslims. You always do that.
It's in Islam. It's inherently in Islam. It's not it's not a single incident case. No. It's inherently in how you guys think.
It's in your your religion. It's inherently in how you were raised. It's inherently in how you you perceive the world. Wow. So so it's not inherent in your case as well.
No. It's a single case. It's a single incident case in your case, but in my case, it's how it's it's my life's work. So I I I mean, imagine if it if it was turned the other way around. If imagine if Hamas was doing what Israel is doing in Gaza right now.
In Israel. If Hamas was doing in Israel, what Israel is doing in Gaza right now. The world would be in it it would be a a cosmic earthquake. Literally. No one would be in their seats.
I mean, we have we have some international support, of course. Sorry. We have international support, of course, but you have to to admit if it if if it had been the other way around, things would have been very different, and the rhetoric would have been extremely violent from your side. Sorry, brother. Go ahead.
No. I just wanted to say, yeah, we fight our you know, the extremist groups that show up. Right? You support your extremist government. Yeah.
That's the difference. SubhanAllah. Brother Toreen.
Oh, okay. It's it's fine, but okay. Yeah, I just want to add something on the topic of colonization and and how the various empires dealt with the the lands they they conquered. I come from the Balkans. I'm a I'm a native, you know, Balkan man, European, whatever you want to call me.
My language isn't Turkish. Okay? My language is not Arabic. My neighbors here have preserved identities, cultures, places of worship, okay, traditions, customs, etcetera, which cannot be said about the native populations in America, North America, in most South America, especially Australia and New Zealand. And I I always chuckle when I hear these, you know, right wingers talk about the decline of the West and how we are losing our identity in freaking North America.
What are you even talking about, man? I mean, you you killed them all. What identity? What culture? You completely replace a native people culture with your own, and then when you have an influx of migrants and you have different people coming in your country to work, you know, to have those measles jobs you don't want to have, then you talk about cultural decline.
Incredible. I mean, look at okay. Maybe we don't have to go to America. Look at Spain. I mean, Spanish people today have the Spanish language.
Their customs preserved. Their church is preserved. What did they do when they come to Cairo? They kicked the Muslims out. They kicked the Jews out.
Where are those communities now? What are you talking about? And you you go you go to North North Africa. You go to, you know, Asia. All of those cultures have been preserved, their languages, their identities.
Islam did not, you know, try to replace any of their identities. Whereas on the other hand, we have this deranged western supremacist idea that I have to conquer the land, I have to rape your women, I have to kill your children, I have to replace the population with my population, and then two hundred years later, I'm going to complain and whine when some migrants come to my country and not all of the people I see around me are white. Absolute lunacy. And to be fair, okay, many westerners share our frustration, and I I I do believe they're up on our side. And I want to commend them for their bravery because it's not easy to speak out against the system.
And I congratulate them on their integrity and truthfulness and and and honesty on their efforts to speak out. So, yeah, I just want to try that.
Yeah. Thank you, brother. Of course, we all, you know, feel the same way, so thank you for voicing it out. Exactly. Like, we came you know, we built.
We helped. Right? You came. You destroyed. You bombed.
Right? Like, you know, people stayed Muslims after we left. You know? People when you left, they you know, how it ended. Right?
So subhanAllah, the stark difference that one can observe. Right? So, yeah, please, sister Iman and brother Angie, if you wanted to add something. I saw your hand up. So please.
Yeah. What brother Naho was saying is absolutely true. I mean, just look at The United States Of America and South America, for example. South America is filled with with Portuguese speakers and Spanish speakers who came from Portugal and Spain. They are not native to the land, and yet the entire population has now been Hispanicized.
You know? They've been replaced. The same thing goes for The United States Of America. The population of The US has been replaced. It wasn't The US before that, and now it's all English speakers.
And the thing is, the same goes for for Britain. Right? When Britain colonizes different places, they replace their population. Same thing goes for Australia. Australia was not natively white people.
It wasn't British people first. They weren't there first. They were in Britain first, and they go there, they replace the population. And they do that through genocide and ethnic cleansings, and they are doing that right now actively with so called Israel. Because as we know, Israel is a geopolitical predator created by the West or the West, and they came to Palestine to replace the population.
And they've been doing this for a very long time, and it has never stopped. So for example, when we look at London, 40% of our population are immigrants, and there are so many people who are very, very annoyed at this. They don't like that 40% of the population are immigrants. But then you look at the entire world and you realize how much havoc The UK has wreaked across the entire world, how much how many genocides, how many ethnic cleansings they've caused, how much slavery they caused across the entire world. So it doesn't even compare.
So what they do is they completely destabilize the entire globe, the entire globe, and then get mad that the people who they've destabilized come to their countries, and it shows you a degree of hypocrisy that you don't see from anybody else. And the same thing goes for when they say we are peacemakers. We love peace. We are amazing. Never again.
Of course, it's all for show. It's all performance. They do this to make you real to make you believe that they would never do it again. They are seeking peace. Like when Isaac Herzog, the president of so called Israel said, the last thing that Israel seeks in this region is to go to war.
We are seeking peace. We are peace seekers. This was months into the genocide of the Palestinian people in Raza. So now absolutely everything they say, they say, meanwhile, killing people and committing genocide because they are doing all of it as a performance and their colonization of the entire world. Britain and France's colonization of 95% of Africa.
All of that is to help them get more money and get more power and feel good about themselves. That's all it's about. It's about the rich and the the the very miniscule amount of people who have power to get more power, to be able to live as lavishly as they want and be able to control the entire world because absolutely every single one of them has a narcissistic complex, a superiority complex that is not real, and just a perception of themselves that they actually project onto the world, believing that they are superior, thus telling everybody else that they are superior, it is in fact not true. And you having to kill people to prove it proves again that it is not true.
I I just wanted to say something, if you don't mind, sort of touching on what brother Naj was talking about. With regards to, for example, tolerance of other cultures and other religions and other beliefs. Just I'll just throw out a statistic for you. The number of, churches per Christian in the Arab world is, 960, Christians per one church. Okay?
So one church for every 960 Christians. But there's only one mosque in the Arab world for 2,800 Muslims. That means that per capita, there's actually more churches for Christians in the Arab world than mosques. And the same goes if you go into the into the Far East into Indonesia, which has a significant Christian population, but you have one church for every 857 Christians, but one mosque for every 1,380 Muslims. So you tell me who's more who who who actually has tolerance?
And again, when you talk about colonization and the difference between what happened with the spread of Islam, and the spread of Western colonization, when if if you wanna compare the spread of Islam to your form of colonization, then logically speaking, when the Westerners came and colonized the Muslim lands, well, the Muslims would have rushed to abandon Islam. It would have been their chance to revive their, pre Islamic cultures, when the Westerners came. But who did that? Nobody did that. They stuck to their religion because Islam, as I said, I don't know if it was in this video or another one, Islam was an empire of faith.
It had nothing to do with, trying to enforce a culture on people or enforce a certain government or a a state or this kind of a a situation or to exploit the resources of this or that country or this or that territory. No. These were people who accepted Islam because they believed in it, and they kept on believing in it. And in fact, it was Islam itself and their belief in Islam that usually fueled their anti colonialism when the Westerners came. They didn't they didn't embrace the approach of secular Westerners into their part of the world as their great opportunity to now revive their so called indigenous pre Islamic cultures.
They they stuck to Islam, and they're still Muslim until today. You came and went, but Islam remained. So how is that how can you make any comparison between that and what you all did, what Western colonizers did? As soon as they got a chance to kick you out, they kicked you out. And as soon as they got a chance to to to liberate themselves from your cultural indoctrination and your exploitation and your oppression, they did it.
And they stuck to what they had before, which was Islam. And nothing could could no matter how hard you tried, you couldn't pry them away from the Quran and from the Sunnah. You couldn't pry them away from Islam. So there's no comparison. And like I said, until today, no matter how much, you all in in the West hype it and talk about, oh, oh, are are Christians safe in the Muslim world?
Well, you have more churches per capita for Christians in the Muslim world than we have mosques, in America, and we have even more per capita for Christians in the Muslim world, then we even have mosques per capita for Muslims.
Exactly. Like, even, you know, when we understand that it's a drenched thought and so on, but look at how many colonized lands are calling for the great caliphate. Right? Because they deal with us, you know, part of the best times that they endure. How many people are calling for, you know, revival of the Roman Catholic church, right, or, you know, like, bringing back the crusades or something like that.
Right? Right? So kinda like, you can see the difference. Like, even when people when they reminisce or something, right, they won't, you know, beg the Muslim empire. Right?
That's what they hope for that it was better times. Yeah. It was better times because, you know, your fellow white people came and they destroyed our lands. Right? That's basically it.
Right? We came and we built. We, you know, we built bridges. Right? You came and built our bridges.
Yeah. And you and you drove the Muslims out of Spain, and what did what what became of Spain after that? What was what was your great wonderful success after you drove the Muslims out of Spain? The only reason anybody even goes to visit Spain now is to look at what the Muslims did.
SubhanAllah. Exactly. So maybe I'll just you know, because we were speaking about this never again, so let us look at the instances of never again, right, just so we understand a bit more. I know that, you know, most of people know of the atrocities that are appearing, right, and so on. But let's go a bit, like, historically.
Right? Just see like, I mentioned that we you know, this country basically started on a genocide. Right? And after they finished up with what they needed to finish up with, right, based on their, you know, devilish intentions, what was the next step? Right?
They started to engage in the worst form of slave trade that the world has ever seen. Right? You know, slavery has existed before everywhere, basically. But the only slavery that we learn about is this type of slavery. Right?
You know, that you literally put people on chains, put them in boats, massacred their societies, took them, drove them out of their homes, and put them on fields, put them on you know? And stuff for allah, what happened to these people. Right? So, you know, it's okay. So they finished up genociding the Native Americans, all of the different tribes, of the communities that they had in those lands.
After finishing that up, they were like, okay. What's next? Oh, let's bring some slaves. Right? And they engaged in the worst form of slavery ever.
Right? And so if anybody wants to speak on that, I will be happy to listen to some examples if you you know, if any of our speakers have some instances of what occurred in these lands. Right? Because I'm just trying to go at the history piece by piece until we reach, you know, the Berlin conference and what ensued from there. So just if anybody of our speakers, you know, who's maybe more into history of Africa, history of these parts of lands, if anybody wants to add something to that, I'll be very happy to hear your insights, inshallah.
Well, I mean, I I think that the most obvious example is Palestine. Maybe it cannot get more of this than that, honestly, because, you know, they they thought about their their crimes of the past, and they hyper focused on what they did during the in the in the Holocaust during the second world war. And then they, you know, prosecuted some of the of the perpetrators and obviously employed others. And then they created this narrative. Okay.
This is the suffering that is ultimately unique, and we deeply apologize for it. It will never happen again, and we will ensure to help the those those people moving forward. So that gave them the pretense for exterminating other peoples in the the peoples in in today's Bangladesh, India, and obviously, Palestine. Right? Because it is the ultimate dream of colonizers.
We will take control of this piece of land that the Muslims cherish, that they, you know, have taken care of for centuries, and we will seek dominion over it. And we will try to portray how we are human and how we've changed by giving the people we oppressed this piece of land. But it's the same bloody project, you know, the separate kind of project that they employed in centuries before. Okay? They're they're trying to fool us into thinking that this is a, you know, great atonement for their sins, and this is how they progressed.
And, you know, this is the ultimate peak of enlightened values. Because, you know, we hated the the Jews. We were a big campaigning here. But we've changed. We've changed now in the beginning of Palestine, completely forgetting completely forgetting that the Palestinians are assimilated people too.
It is their homeland, you know. So they're just doing the same thing, but they found a way to trick their populations into hating another people. So they just moved on from explicitly hating one people to another people because this is what they do. Right? So there's no real change there.
And they're trying to say, you know, the the the the journal, like, you know, the the the Germans today, that's that's so pro Israel. They're you know, pro Jews and pro Jewish religion. Right? And they think that because they do that, it gives them carte blanche to dehumanize other peoples because they do not see Palestinians as equals. That's the end of it, really.
I mean, that's the the bottom line. So I I I guess because, you know, we we we've been seeing this genocide for the last year in in Palestine, and that that's the best example one one can give, honestly, because it is right in front of our eyes, and it is our duty now with all the culture that we have with social media to not them to not let them get away with it. Because the one who controls narrative controls how people view that, and then how do they, think, most people in the world see through it. They see through the propaganda and, like, outside of the hardcore, you know, neocolonial populations dispersed across the West, and nobody believes in their in their project. And so, you know, that's what I I could think of when we talk about, you know, this never again story that they have.
Yeah. You know, their own creation. Right? All of these social media and this technology, this progress. Right?
And it's basically turning against them. Right? You know, like me. As you just mentioned, right, there is no way you can see what's happening. Right?
If you can say that you haven't seen it or, like, there is no excuse. There's no excuse. I can sort of understand if you were in Belgium in, you know, 1730 and you had no idea what Belgium is doing. Okay. You know, let's take it as some kind of excuse.
But now, like, what is your excuse? How can you support Bomb Bank of Children? How can you support Bomb Bank of Hospitals? How can you support Bomb Bank of Schools? Like, what is wrong with you?
Right? This is unbelievable. So yeah. Okay. So this is the example that we can see now directly in front of our eyes.
Yeah. They are saying something with their mouth, and their actions are completely the opposite of what they're saying. Right? And, of course, I'm not saying that they the populations didn't know about what was happening, you know, before. I'm just saying that one can probably somehow make an excuse for some people in some village that had no idea about what's going on.
Yeah. Don't take me, please, for my word. I'm just saying that it could have been more understandable their, you know, ignorance compared to what we have today. Of course, I'm not trying to justify anything. I'm just saying that the information that we have now, it's glaring.
Right? It's we can see directly what has what is happening. Right? Everyone can see it in real time from photos to videos to everything. Right?
That we are able to see it and, of course, may Allah alleviate all of their pain. Right? Because it's really terrible for all of us to see what's happening. I know we are all hurting, and it's heavy for all of us. So, you know, Right?
Let us be patient and pray to Allah and do what's in our best of capabilities. And all of these diplomatic efforts that the countries are doing, inshallah, inshallah, it will have one end only, and that is the liberation of Palestine, and we all believe that with all of our hearts, inshallah, inshallah. So just one step back again. You know, Palestine and the issue of Palestine, can date it to, like, 1920. It's like this whole Zionist project.
Right? That was and never again after the you know, what happened in Europe and so on. Right? But with that, like, look how they even separated our countries. Right?
Like, look how they decided arbitrarily on borders, just their basic tactic of divide and conquer all the time. All the time. Divide and conquer. That is their approach. And I just saw that brother Amar wanted to relate something to that.
So if you wanna speak up, just feel free.
Yeah. Thank you so much, Kareem. So I'm sure many of your guys here are aware of the Berlin conference. If you don't, please Google it. It's a it's a thing.
Right? So what happened essentially in 1886, I believe, was that the European civilized nations got together in Berlin and big wow for Berlin, especially selecting Berlin. But anyway, so they got together in Berlin and they got the map of Africa because they had known where Africa lies and where its borders were, what the continent had in terms of natural resources. And they literally got a pencil and a ruler and they started carving out protectorates and colonies for for themselves. Okay?
And and there there is no word to describe this. Like, you you literally get a map and you you forget the people on the map. You forget the faces on the map. There there it's a map. To them, it was only a map.
Lands, unending lands of natural resources, a source of wealth, and that's it. And then they started growing borders between their colonies because they don't want to fight, because they're done fighting each other. Right? So they don't want to fight. So they were they were very civilized in the manner that they distributed Africa amongst themselves.
Africa and Asia, probably later on, but in this event specifically, it was Africa. And so they were civilized in the manner they distributed Africa amongst themselves. It's called the the scramble for Africa. I remember. And so they they divided these colonies amongst each other.
And of course, the point being made about King Vapo II of Belgium, who who literally had the conflict all for himself as a personal fiefdom. So they carved Africa for themselves. And then, after they were exhausted because of the fight of the second world war, not because of any benevolence or because, you know, they believe that all human beings have a right of self determination. No. But because they literally could not maintain their colonies after the second world war.
So they had to tell those colonies that now you are countries. You are nation states. Of course, the obvious problem was that when they first drew those borders, they had no they didn't care at all. They had no regard. They had no regard at all for the ethnicities they were drawing the lines upon.
Okay? So you could literally literally be sleeping overnight and wake up to find that you were a part of a country where you had no cultural ties whatsoever. Simply because someone forty or sixty or seventy years ago decided that he wanted to draw the line because he didn't want to fight with another European like himself and they said that, okay, we're going to take this part and you're going to take that part. I mean, look at the Tajspeko for example. This is I I think is more relevant for for for people like us in The Middle East.
Right? So the Tajspeko was like like this, literally, the the dialogue was like this. We want Syria. Okay. You can take it.
Okay. We want Iraq too. Fine. Anything else? Yeah.
We want Jerusalem. That's literally the dialogue that went on between those two guys. They are the two people who designated the countries of the Middle East as we know them today. And so, of course, you'd have to you the seeds for any internal conflict were already there due due to this, you know, border designation, which reflected nothing cultural on the ground. Of course, you have to have conflicts everywhere, especially in Africa, where tribes were living and they had their own dominions and their own zones.
And of course, they were warring tribes. That's that's that's natural because we're not native we're not saying that people do not war, but they know not they they do not war for the reasons that Europeans war for and they do not do it at the same rate that Europeans do it. And not at the same extreme level of savaginess that the Europeans do it. So going back to the carving of borders, people essentially are still, especially in Africa, they are still suffering today because of this division of borders or the designation of nation states, which they did not they were not part of. They were not part of their nation state being made.
They just woke up and found that this was a nation state, they had to be citizens of this nation state. They could be not they could not be speaking the same language. They could not have the same faith or religion. They could not they can have nothing in in in common with with their fellow citizens, but they would have they had to face the the the reality. But now they are citizens in the nation state.
They could be a minority and they could be persecuted because they are because nation states do not tolerate minorities. They do not tolerate ethnic minorities. And so what happened was that essentially Europe, when they designated nation states in Africa especially, they were planting the seeds for internal conflict. You cannot blame it on Africans being savages. No.
You did that to them. You create a nation states that did not reflect their cultures, their commonalities, and so they had to fight. It was a matter of time. Thank you.
I mean Thank you very much. And yeah. Sorry.
No. No. I was just gonna say, you asked the question about, you know, examples of examples to show or to highlight how the West has not changed. But I'm asking where where is an example to highlight that they have changed? I mean, you have you have for example, the Dutch East India Company becomes the British East India Company.
Then in the in The US, you had the United Fruit Company in Guatemala. It becomes Chiquita Banana. Then you have now you have Blackrock. What's the difference? And and look at Congo today.
Tell me how is Congo today any different than it was under King Leopold? As I said, where's the difference? You had slavery, cattle slavery, then you had indentured servitude. You had, for example, the coal miners who who whatever whatever wage that they earned digging coal out of a mountain, went right back to the company. That's where you even got the the song from.
I I, sold my soul to the company store because their their their food, their, shelter, their, clothing, everything they had to buy from the company store, which was where they would pay them their wages and then take the wages right back again. That's slavery. You just complicated things. That's all you did. You just made things more complex, but you're doing the exact same things that you've always done.
You you went from the from what they did to the miners with the indentured servitude, which is just a form of bondage slavery, and you have wage slavery, you have debt slavery. This is all you do, and like I said, I think I said in the video, I was talking about all of the various forms of sexual slavery that colonizers imposed in the countries where they colonized. That's well after the the so called Emancipation Proclamation. That was well after you officially banned slavery on the earth while you were still engaging in it. In in all of the different countries that you invaded, you were still engaging in it.
So I'm I'm I'm saying, can anyone show me an example that you have changed? Because because as I said earlier, from where we're sitting, from where Muslims are sitting, and from where anyone in the global South is sitting, we don't see any evidence whatsoever of any change of any shape or form. Like I said, look at Congo today, and look at Congo when it was under King Leopold. It's exactly the same situation.
Can I just add on the Africa? Yes.
Yeah. Please just add whatever you can. We are happy you're here with us.
Thank you. Was having problems. I hope it will not give me more problem. Okay. So in Africa, I mean, the western civilized the West impact on Africa.
Actually, how they left Africa shows you exactly how barbaric they are. I mean, they came to a land rich of resources, rich of, you know, culture, vast land with all these resources, and look at it now how it is after all these centuries. And they came in the name of civilization. They came saying that they will civilize this barbaric continent. And yet what they just brought was death, destruction, exploitation.
I mean, it's still to this day, we are suffering of the scars of their colonization. And none, nothing, nothing of what they have built was for the people but for themselves. I mean, they did build the rails and the buildings, but it was never, never, never for the for the people but for their own to aid their own exploitation. And who is to forget the the the the genocide, the mass killing of the natives of, you know, the in Namibia, for example, the Herrero and the Namas, the those people that were killed there besides The Congo. In The Congo and king Diopar's mass genocide of the Congolese just so they can steal their land, their resources.
And as brother Omar said about the Berlin conference in the eighteenth I think eighteenth nineteenth century. Yeah. Eighteenth eighty something. They did draw their the borders in such a way that they they literally disregarded anything in terms of the ethnic and the and the cultural boundaries. For example, in a country where there are ethnic groups, they literally drew the the borders to divide people of the same linguistic and cultural background or ethnicity, they divided them into two separate countries.
They it just encouraged them to have even more conflict between themselves. So all the what they have done in Africa is just evil. Evil. Evil. I don't know what kind of civilization is a civilization that comes to a a land, a vast land rich in resources, and leaves it with nothing.
Nothing to show that they have done any kind of work that makes them look like civilized. I mean, Africa is literally a good example to show how barbaric they are because they have not left anything of dignity, anything of what that rich continent was, any trace of how rich it is, except they exploited and and taken it. I remember even the funny part is they come back now. Okay? Some of the of those who are in Namibia, especially.
They talk about for example, in my daughter's school, she had a Namibian lady student there, and they were talking about history, about about colonization. And this lady, of course, she heard it from her parents of in her community, and she was talking about reverse racism in Namibia. She is white. She is an a Dutch Namibian, and she was talking about reverse racism. I mean, my daughter, she she came home and she asked me about how is that reverse racism, and I just couldn't answer her in a better way than to tell her, first, know what racism is.
First, understand what racism and colonization is, and then she can claim what reverse racism. She is still Dutch and Namibian, by the way. She she still have all the resources that they have stolen from the locals. They haven't compensated the people that they have, massacred to get this and steal their lands, and yet they are coming now and talking about reverse racism. I don't know what these people want, to be honest.
I mean, you give it's it's a lost bottle to try to change them because they will still feel that no matter how much they have taken from all the resources that was in Africa, they will still complain of being the victims. Somehow, they brought it like they made it about themselves and not about the millions that they have killed. So this article six that we are coming back to article six that we are campaigning, it's about accountability. If we are not to hold nations, people accountable to what they have done no matter when, I don't like, we shouldn't care when. At least they should acknowledge what they have done.
They should know. They should teach it in the in the history books what they have done so that it cannot well, we will hope that it will not be done, in the future. Never again again, it will come back. But, again, we should teach them that they need to hold account. It it doesn't, help saying that it wasn't me.
It was my great grandfather. They are still they are still gaining from that they still gain from what their grandparents did, from what their ancestors did. Okay? So they need to hold themselves into account, and they need to be held into account. And that's why we are trying to hold The United States into account so that this this generational trauma of colonization, exploitation, killings stops, once and for all.
Thank you.
No. Exactly, sister. Like, they will blame their grandparents, right, even though they are just committing genocide now. Right? Like, what is the difference between you and your grandparents who, you know, exactly as brother Jaithsat were having picnics with, you know, black people hanging from the tree next to them?
Like, what is the difference? Exactly as you say, it's about self accountability, self reflection. Right? And, you know, like, great point, sisters. Thank you very much, and I'm very happy that we can hear from your perspective, right, because you are from, you know, that part of the world, and you just add so much benefit.
So thank you very much. Also, sister Shetu, if you wanna add something, I'll just let you, yeah, add to this point, and then I will and Allah continue.
I believe that a major reason that besides their natural intractability and tendencies, that there has been no real alteration in the behavior patterns of belligerent, militarized Western societies is because Africans never, under the circumstances that they were under, never went west and decided to blow up bridges, military bases, or cause any physical violence to Western people while they were in Western lands. Belgium, Portugal, Germany, The Netherlands never feared that any of the peoples they were subjugating in Africa would mount a brigade and turn up in their land and start blowing up bridges and killing people. So it's a very unequal equation that doesn't lend to any form of change for the aggressor.
Okay. Thank you very much, sister. I just wanna highlight a bit that, you know, we do not approach the matter in the same way that they approach it. Okay? Like, we are never for violence according to their understanding.
Right? Our struggle is always to stop violence. I would just like to address a point, in Allah, that was made in the comments. The sister Nina, you know, the listener Nina asked about Arab slavery versus Western slavery. And I think this is a very good point to get it into the next step that I wanna focus on because we cannot use their paradigms.
We cannot use their words. We cannot use anything that they portray. Because, you know, this is their, like, quote, unquote common sense. Right? They use their words, then it's as if it's reflective of our system.
Like, even this word slavery, for us Muslims, it was never slavery. It was never, you know, it was never the system or the word or, like, what is understood by this word. And I would like to because brother Omar from our group, he's like you know, he's knowledgeable in our religion, and I would just like to ask him if he can add something to that point because it really showcases the stark difference between Muslim approach and the western approach to anything. Right? And I wanna start from this point, inshallah, then we can move on to other points.
So if you please can just open up your mic and give us an idea about the difference, how we approach it, how do we even like, how the Islam, you know, tries to eliminate it. Right? That Islam is basically just addressing the realities that exist. But by all means possible, it's trying to get rid of the system. It's not saying that it's a good system.
It's just addressing that it is existing, you know, just yet. So I'll let you I don't wanna confine you. Right?
So speak on No worries, Karim. Thank you so much. Well, it's like you said. Right? Okay.
So the thing of it the thing is about Eurocentrism or Westernism or what have you is that they believe that their common sense is the common sense, which is absolutely nonsense. Right? You can't you cannot possibly imagine that the 8,000,000,000 people living on this planet will have the same ideas as as you, will have the same way, the same perception about life and death like you, the the same perception about religion, the role of religion in life, the role of the nation state in people's lives, everything. So you cannot you cannot say that, for example, liberal democracy is the way for the 8,000,000,000 people around the world. You cannot say that.
You cannot make that claim. And the same applies to slavery. The so called word slavery, quote unquote. Okay? Because they're so mad at their own slavery, the cotton plantation slavery.
Right? Because they the slavery where they they they kidnapped people from Western Africa and they took them on ships and left them to die and threw them off the ships when they determined that they were sick and that they were not going to live enough. And then the ones who lived, they took to the Mainland Of America and enslaved them there and then bred them in cages like dogs and, you know, and treated them like animals and separated families from each other just because they wanted to send the father and keep the children or send the children and keep the father or send the wife and keep the husband. They had no regard whatsoever for for for those families of slaves. And they think the whole world did that to slaves like they did to slaves, which is absolutely in in inaccurate, incomplete, incoherent, everything.
Everything about it is is is so wrong on so many levels. Right? So in Islam, we don't call it slavery. We call it or or, you know, having someone you you own. And when Islam came, it was the like, up to the up to that point in human history, slave or owning people was part of the way the world lived.
Right? As as poise of war, slaves were owned or let's call them slaves for now. Slaves were owned and they were purchased and sold and so on and so forth as part of life. The difference is is that when Islam came, that that there were many exits for you as a slave. So for for for one example, when people wanted to to loosen their to make amends for their sins, for example, they could let slaves go.
They could let slaves let them free, set them free. Okay? And there are tons upon tons upon tons of instances in Sharia or Islam where you if you want to make amends for your sin, you just let a slave go. And speaking from an economic point of view, only people was not not was not cheap. It was something of very high value.
So letting slaves go meant that you paid a lot of a lot of money. Okay? So what Islam did was, in many aspects, tried to make people make amends for their sins because everyone makes, you know, everyone makes sense. So everyone's sins. Sorry.
So if you want to to make amends for your sins, you let slaves go. That was the main goal. Of course, you're not allowed to enslave Muslims and if you get Muslims in if even if you even enslaved people during a war, if they announce or declare their Islam, they're not slaves anymore. Right? So if you trace it very, very carefully, and if you trace it from a non worldwide common sense point of view, you will find that Islam actually narrows down the sources of slavery and expands the sources of making people free.
This is one point. The other point, and that's a very important point, is that not everybody on the planet operates like Europeans. Europeans operate in binaries. Right? So you're either a slave or you're free.
That's not how it works. Slavery throughout human history was not a zero one game. It's it's what it wasn't a free, unfree game. No. People had different levels of freedom throughout history and throughout cultures, throughout history.
And some of the slaves I mean, look at Egypt, for example. The Mamluqid the Mamluqid dynasty in Egypt. Mamluq in Arabic in English means owned. Those were sultans of Egypt. Those were people who ruled the Middle East.
Those were the strongest state that ruled the Middle Ages that ruled Egypt and The Levant in the Middle Ages. And everyone wanted to to to friends with them, from Europe to Constantinople to the to the East. And those were slaves. They were sold in slave markets, they, you know, got up the ranks until they became sultans. So there are instances in other parts of the world that which are not the West, where slaves were treated fairly, and they were treated in a way that didn't make them feel so bad about their lives.
Of course, we're not advocating slavery, but we're saying that slavery meant so much more in other parts of the world, than the West that it isn't even the same word. We cannot use the same word to describe both, states. Thank you.
Exactly. We cannot use their words for anything. Right? Because it's completely different realities. And once, you know, one uses the same word, it immediately projects in his head some image of something which is completely different than the actual reality of that thing.
Right? And, you know, our scholars went a lot into the thing being named, how it's different from the name, and the process of naming things. And it's really kind of philosophical, like, bordering kind of philosophical topic, but it's really at the core of how we perceive things. Right? So, you know, brother Shahid, if you wanted to add something.
I'm sorry if I stopped you because Not at all.
Not at all. I do I I didn't I I sort of wanted to say something with regards to what just to Wahidah was talking about. And on one level, I agree with what she's saying. On another level, I I think it's maybe her emotions are getting the better of her. As I think everyone is familiar with the statement of Amr Mukhtar, which was that they are not our teachers.
We don't learn how to be, behave, how and how to deal with our challenges from our enemies. I think that what has this this actually sort of touches upon what you were just talking about, which is that the West has their own frame of reference. And then they projected onto the world, and they think that everyone thinks the way that they do. They think that the way that they did slavery is the way that everyone did slavery. The way that they think is the way that everyone thinks and so forth.
And to a certain extent, all people are guilty of that because you have your own frame of reference, and so you tend to think that other people must be like you. And I think that what, our problem has been is that the Muslims and the people throughout the global South are unquestionably more civilized than the people in the West. Unquestionably. That's just evidence by the fact that we are the ones who have been oppressed by them. We are the ones whose whose countries have been exploited.
We're the ones who have been enslaved. We're the ones who have been genocided and subjected to their violence. So just this alone shows you which which nations are more civilized than the other. So our mistake is projecting upon them that they are civilized like we are, and that when they, for example, express values and principles and morals, that on some level they must mean it, And that we can deal with them the same way that we deal with each other, which is in a civil, dignified, decent, honorable, respectable way. So we think that we should be able to deal with them that way.
And we don't understand that there are people in this world coming mostly from that hemisphere who simply do not believe in harmony. They simply do not believe in mutual benefit. They have, as brother said, they have this binary zero sum mentality where I have to have everything and you have to have nothing, and that's just the way the relationship has to be. They don't understand the idea that we can actually just get along and both of us can prosper. They feel that if anyone is prospering other than them, they're losing something.
So we have to just adjust our mindset, our mentality, and understand that we are not in a situation in which we can compromise with them in that way, that we can we cannot deal with them expecting a level of civilization from them that we expect from one another. In other words, we have to accept the reality that we are in a situation of confrontation with these people. Now once you have once you have made that adjustment, then you have to determine how you are going to approach that confrontation. And the way that you approach that confrontation has to be dictated by your morals, by your principles, by your beliefs, by your religious law. If you're a Muslim, it has to be, determined according to Sharia.
And then furthermore, it has to be determined according to your own intellect. You have to use your own intelligence to know how to approach this confrontation in a way that will be successful. And speaking as someone who used to be a boxer, I know that when you're getting into a fight with someone, you don't target their strengths, and you don't make your strategy based upon their powers, based upon their strengths. You you base your strategy and how you approach that fight based upon their weaknesses and their vulnerabilities, the things that they're not the strongest in. Well, the West is very strong in violence.
They are extremely strong in violence, and they are just like we were talking about earlier, like brother Natalie was talking about. I think it was brother Natalie. No. I think it was maybe brother MG was talking about the the comparison to a police officer. How they try to goad you in to to resisting arrest, so called.
They try to push you and and and put you in a position to where they can justify being violent towards you. This is a very losing strategy, and this has been a mistake that we have made. We have to approach this challenge. We have to approach this confrontation. First of all, understanding that it is a challenge, that it is a confrontation, and then we have to approach it in a way of strategy, strategic thinking, and understanding, for example, what they value versus what we value.
For example, as Muslims, what we value more than anything else is our. We value our iman. We value our morals and principles. So they try to target that in us to try to bring us down away from our values, to try to corrupt us, to try to make us more interested in Dunya, which is what they're interested in. They're interested in the Dunya.
So for example, if you're looking at the West, if you're looking at particularly America, I think that I've talked about this before. I think that at at some point within the last say thirty years or so, lot of the Arab countries had a kind of an epiphany that all this time we thought that they believed in all of these so called enlightenment values that they talk about. And and we thought that that meant that we had to sort of tiptoe around their values because they'd be offended. But then at a certain point, I think over the course of the the first war or or what's what what Americans call the first Gulf War, and the second Gulf War, the occupation of Iraq, and the occupation of Afghanistan, I think the the the Muslim world and the Arab world had this collective epiphany of, oh, actually, they don't mean a single word they say. And actually, the only thing they care about is money.
The only thing they care about is money. The West are nothing but prostitutes, and they will make, they'll go to bed with anyone who's got the money. And The Gulf has realized that, and they've been able to buy a tremendous amount of influence in the West through investment, through investment strategies, through what you can call economic conquest. And this is a a wise approach. It's a confrontational approach, but if someone has it in their mind that the only means of confrontation is through violence, I'm afraid that that's a confrontation that you're going to lose because that's exactly the way they want you to fight because that's the only way they know how to fight.
But this isn't the approach in Islam. This isn't the this isn't the approach of Rasulullah I mean, if you look at what if we're gonna get into talking about if we're talking about, for example, Islamic terms that are misused by the West, one of the the main ones is the term Jihad. Well, fought against his enemies, yes, by targeting their caravans, but you may have to think about what that meant. That wasn't just a a war, that was economic warfare targeting their caravans because that's what the Quraysh cared about, was their money. They cared about their money, their material lifestyle, their material prestige.
Rasulullah fought against his enemies by digging a trench around Medina. That was Jihad. He fought the he he he fought his enemies by buying the well of that was Jihad. He fought against the Kufar. He fought against his enemies by burning down the trees of Bani Nadir.
That was Jihad. And he fought them through espionage. He fought them through cunning. He fought them through diplomacy. He fought them through, freeing of slaves that the that his enemies owned.
That was jihad. This is strategy. And he even you can even say that the tree of Hudaybiyah was a form of jihad because that gave the Muslims an a huge advantage when he did that. And it and it put the the the enemies of Islam at a huge disadvantage. This is strategy.
This is approaching your confrontation with your enemies in an intelligent way, in a way that you are determining based upon your principles, your values, your beliefs, and what Allah has revealed. Not learning from them how to act like them because they're gonna do that that form of confrontation better than you because that's what they've that's the only thing they've ever done. That's the only thing they've ever been good at is violence. Just like I think I said in the video, that's the main thing that they know how to manufacture and that's the main thing that they know how to export. So if you want to confront with them, if you want to be in a confrontation with them, well, you're gonna have to find another way to do it.
And don't do it their way because that's the one thing they're good at. And you as I said, if you're gonna get into a fight with someone, you don't fight them according to their strengths. You fight them according to their weaknesses.
Brother. I wanted exactly to bridge that way, and you did it, you know, even better beyond my imagination. So Yeah. Exactly. Like, even when you say the term violence, right, and, you know, they equate jihad with violence, that's not the way we understand it.
We are trying to stop injustice. That's the only purpose. They are trying to permeate injustice. Right? They are trying to start injustice.
We are trying to stop it. And you cannot use the same word for totally different realities. Right? And that was the same with the slavery. We cannot call it slavery because, you know, once just the word is mentioned, immediately what pops in the head is a blood person back to a chain.
And that's not the way it was understood anywhere. That's just the Western experience and the the Western experience that they try to, you know, generalize on everyone everywhere. Right? This is not the way it was. And it like, it wasn't done this way anywhere.
Right? And the same with the violence. The violence that we see from the West, this has never been done anywhere in this form ever. You know, like, So, really, what I would like to, you know, encourage our listeners and people who have joined the space, dissect their words. Right?
And exactly as you said, you know, we suddenly understood that their freedom and their democracy, that's not what they mean. They mean money. Right? And that's exactly it. When we say these words, we mean them.
We mean, you know, freedom. We mean democracy, you know, like, you know, people to have the right to have some opinion, to have some voice. Right? We mean these things. Right?
But we had to realize that they completely do not mean it at all. Right? And this is key. Right? So whenever they say a word, understand that it's just the projection of their understanding of the word.
Right? It's not the word that can be generalized to all other approaches. Right? When they say I I remember some video from brother Shahid. Right?
You know, they will call they will call it bombing. Right? And they do not care if it's done, like, preemptively attack or when, for example, when Iran retaliated. Right? And they just name it bombing.
It's not bombing. Right? One is attack, and the other is self defense. It's not the same. They are different realities.
You cannot use the same word. Right? And it's about everything, about violence. Right? They will say that jihad equals violence.
No. Jihad is to stop injustice. Jihad is to, you know, promote justice. Jihad is in all of the means, right, as you said diplomatically by making treaties, by espionage, by any possible ways, and the violence is, like, the last part that one will go to. Right?
That's the, you know, thing that we are trying to avoid the whole time. Right? The jihad is basically to avoid violence. Right? But they will make it sound as if jihad equals violence and everybody does it and it's the same and whatever.
Alright. Yeah. Sorry, brother. I'm not wanting to speak up. So
No worries, man. Karim, it's this it's the same thing. Right? It's a projection. So when we say jihad, it's our way of doing war.
It's our timing of war, and it's it's the mannerisms and the the the the precautions that we take when we when we make war against someone. Right? And when they do war in a violent way, which they do, they say that, okay. So if you do it, Jihad, which is your way of war, then you must do it like us, which means that Jihad is violent. So it's essentially a very, very big and very, very fake production.
Like, for example, look at the Crusades. The Crusades up until the Crusades, Muslims and Christians, quote unquote, but they were essentially states. But let's say that Muslims and Christians were fighting, presented in the the in the Abbasids and the Byzantines, for example, or the Romans, the Eastern Romans. But they had a code of manner. They had a code of war.
They could not break it regarding what she what they should do in in times of in battles and in war. Right? But when the crusaders came, they terrorized everyone because of because they were savages, essentially. They broke the rules of the game. There is nothing that those guys didn't do.
They ate children. They they went back on their promises. They they the only thing that kept those people going, other than that some of the Muslim rulers at the time were weak, is that they were very, very terrorizing. That they made it abundantly clear that if you do not give us your city, we will take it from you if we are able to take it, and we will do everything in our power to make the city fall to the ground, and we will burn it. We will essentially burn it from existence.
That's not the how the way other Christians even did that. Eastern Christians were very, very, very civilized from from those guys. They were much more civilized than those guys. Right? So they have no code of conduct during war.
They say that we cannot, you know, take, like, the the the concubines taken during war. Really. I mean, how many videos have we seen brother Shahid talking about the the the the what call do it? The the the trafficking the the trafficking of refugees done by by forces of Western countries. The trafficking of of females into the West.
How many times have how many incidents have that have that has that happened in Iraq and in in in many other countries, in many other African countries? So you you claim that you want to to have a code of conduct during war, but you don't even step up to it. You yourselves don't even step up to it. Whereas we have a have a more civilized code of conduct because we know what people do during war, and we know that that some things cannot be stopped, so we have to just payment and, you know, prune it. And we have rights for those who have been taken during war as prisoners.
But you you claim to have made them equal equal to their to their captors, but you don't stand by those rules anyhow.
Yeah. Exactly. Brother. And it just came to my mind, right, the word self defense. Right?
Really? Really self defense, is it the same on both sides? Right? And just think about these words and what they mean and what they reflect and how they use it to manipulate realities, to manipulate, you know, how you think to propagandize you. And yeah.
It's it's paneled on. It's really amazing. So okay.
Can can I just can I sorry? Can I just say something quickly in relation
to this? So
Again, with with regards to violence, this is not this is neither an advocacy of non violence nor a condemnation of armed resistance when it is justified, obviously. Armed resistance is justified and it's even in international law. And and with regards to self defense, as I've said many times, everyone should know by now, no. Israel does not have a right to self defense against an occupied people that they are occupying. Legally, they don't have a right to that.
But with regards to violence, again, I would just mention, I'm pretty sure that most of the people who are listening have heard of something called the military industrial complex. If you engage in violence, this is exactly what they want, and not only, will you be, bringing death and destruction upon your own people, but you will be giving prosperity to your enemies. You will be fueling their economy, not depleting their economy. That should that's the opposite of what you should be wanting to do. And then with regards to, for example, what I just mentioned about what the law says, the law that they put down on paper and that they signed off on, such as the UN Charter that they signed off on, what we know about them is that they these documents are the last thing that they ever wanna have recourse to unless it's against their enemies.
They never want it to be applied to themselves. That shows you what their weakness is. The thing that they never want to have applied to themselves, versus the thing that they always wanna have applied to themselves, which is confrontation, conflict, violence, destruction, death, and bloodshed. This is what they live off of. This is their bread and butter.
But the last thing that they want is for you to call them to account for what they signed on paper. That's the last thing that they want. So that shows you what their weakness is and what their vulnerability is. Diplomacy has always been their last resort. Whereas for us, violence is our last resort.
Violence is the first thing that they go to, and it's the last thing that we go to. And diplomacy is the first thing that we go to, and violence is the last thing that we go to. So this shows you already what their weaknesses are, what their priorities are, and how they want the battle to be fought. So you can never fight the battle the way your enemy wants it to be fought.
And to all of our listeners who took, you know, two hours of their time to be here with us and go over the misconceptions of the West about violence and extremism. You know, of course, we didn't go to the domestic violence that America is doing correctly. You know? Like, really, when you go about these misconceptions, you can go on for hours and hours at a time. Alright?
Like, I think that the point that we tried to convey and that brother Shahid tried to convey in his videos has been reached. I you know, we look at what they tried to do in the world and, basically, how this dissonance, right, exists in their minds. Like, how can they be calling for peace and promoting themselves as, you know, peace bringers to the world when all that we have seen is bloodshed, violence, subjugation, colonization, dividing, trying to conquer, trying to subjugate. Right? We can see the realities.
And, of course, I believe that most of our listeners here are from parts of the world that have suffered from the Western supremacy syndrome. So I hope that the point has reached, inshallah, without, you know, detailing every single instance, every single evidence. They are, like, uncountable. So with that, inshallah, I would like to thank everyone that was here. First of all, I would like to thank our speakers.
I would like to thank brother Shahid for, you know, trying to open our eyes to these realities, trying to make us look, you know, into things that we have not seen or from perspective that we have not seen them. We try to contrast it with our Islamic approach because this is always what we refer to. Right? This is our basis. Like, we cannot assess things in a different manner than through the lens of Islam.
We are Muslims, and, you know, we believe in Islamic supremacy. Right? And we will not hide the fact that sometimes violence is a necessary mean. We have you know, like, we are not promoting our ideals using violence, but we are still defending in the correct understanding of the world using violence. Alright?
So we went over the you know, even some aspects of the colonization over aspects of the slave. We explained the difference the stark difference between it of our understanding of it, of their understanding of you know, really covered lots of and lots of different aspects of it. So this session was, you know, focused on violence and extremism and what's their misconceptions about it. And inshallah inshallah, in our third session that we will try to cover next week at the same time, we will try to go about misconceptions on capitalism, on misconceptions about economics. Right?
Because, you know, they portray themselves, again, the West as if they are the ones who brought economics to the world. Right? They are the ones who brought the free markets. They are the ones who promote all of these great policies. Right?
And we are all ignorant idiots around, you know, in the rest of the world that have to learn from them while the reality is completely different. Right? So we will try to go into all of this inshallah. We will go into the debt slavery mechanism that they use, the wage slavery. It has not changed.
Right? This is what we are trying to showcase all the time. Right? The West has never civilized. West has never changed, and they do not understand.
And we need to be able to have, you know, firmly rooted understanding so we can, in Allah, educate them. Right? Because they have not been educated by their own people. They have been misled. And we, as Muslims, believe in justice, and that's why we are talking about this.
Right? We are not trying to make some echo chamber and just now our purpose is bigger. Right? We need to bring the light. This is the purpose of, you know, the Muslims, inshallah, inshallah.
So with that, again, I'd like to thank you and hope that I will inshallah be able to see you all next week. And, yeah, thank you very much, and everyone for your efforts, everyone who spoke, everyone who joined, and see you
next so much, Karim.
تمّ بحمد الله