The ICJ just indicted itself

Okay. So, I had earlier said that there were two options of how the the the judgment today at the ICJ might go. One was that they would vote in favor of special provisions, emergency provisions and measures to intervene in the situation in Gaza. And the other was that they would vote against it and that they wouldn't that they would, they would say that this was uncalled for. I failed to consider the possibility that there was a third option which was that they would do neither.

And, that they would essentially do nothing. Which is what they what the ICJ ended up doing. They did nothing. All they did was basically say to Israel, don't do all of the they they provided all of the evidence. They cited all of the evidence of Israel's violations and of Israel's violations of the of the genocide, the articles of genocide.

They cited all of that evidence. And then they basically said, so we're we're telling Israel that they shouldn't do those things. That's what they did. We're saying don't do the things that we are currently deliberating whether or not you're doing them. Stop doing the things and and try to avoid doing the things that we might in a few years time issue a verdict that it amounts to genocide.

That's all. That's all they did. They said, you know, that AID should enter Gaza but AID has been entering Gaza. This the statement by the the ultimate statement except for all of the evidence that was presented in the first part of the statement by the judge. The first part of the statement by the judge was all of the evidence that condemns Israel and which now actually condemns the ICJ.

The second part when when they announced their conclusion could have been written by the US State Department. That could have been Anthony Blinken talking. Just saying, we want everything to be nice in Gaza and Israel should be nice. That's all. That's all they said.

So as I said, all of the evidence that was presented, that South Africa presented, to the International Court of Justice, all of the evidence that they presented, of proof of genocide being committed by Israel, all of that evidence now indicts the International Court of Justice. Because they cited all of that evidence and even after citing all of that evidence, all of that proof of, genocide being committed, their only response to that was we would we we think that Israel probably shouldn't do those things. And we and we kind of more or less order them not to do those things. And we give them a month to to not do those things. But we still haven't decided whether or not they're doing them.

And whether or not doing those things amounts to genocide. So avoid doing the things that you're not supposed to do. That's what they said. No actual special provisions. No actual special measures.

No emergency measures were taken. But this is a victory. In the long term, this is a victory. You have to think long term. And anything, that discredits western institutions, western political colonialist institutions is a good thing.

All of what's happening now, the genocide case against Israel, all of this is a coordinated BRICS plan to isolate The United States systematically and even using the mechanisms within the system that they themselves created and established. They're using their own system to isolate The United States. And to basically, basically what the ICJ did today, when they didn't grant actually any significant, meaningful, emergency measures and provisions in the case of Gaza, what they did grant was a divorce. They granted a divorce between the global South and institutions of western power because they just exposed themselves unambiguously that the ICJ is compromised. We've already known it.

We knew that they were, but we hoped maybe they were gonna side with the future. Side with the global South. Side with the actual global international community instead of the West and instead of The United States. But they decided not to side with the future. They decided to side with the past and so that's where they will be left, in the past.

Everything that's happening now, including the the various measures at the United Nations and at the, International Court of Justice, all of that, in my opinion, amounts to the BRICS nations trying to expose the irrelevance, the bias, and the colonialist nature of all of these so called global institutions that are actually western institutions of global control. That's what they are. And they're exposing them to be exactly that, so that, the global South and the the the actual global international community can finally conclude that we can't deal with these institutions anymore. We have to come up with our own. So they're showing the incompetence and the unreliability of these western controlled so called global, international institutions.

Western institutions like the United Nations, like the International Court of Justice, showing showing that these are tools of western colonialism and they need to be abandoned and they need to be replaced. And I think that that's in and of itself is a victory. There's no way that we, could lose today depending on, no matter what the ruling was. If they ruled correctly and ruled for actual meaningful, interventionary measures in Gaza, that would have been a victory clearly. But what they did is also a victory because it shows the whole world that we don't need to even deal with your institutions anymore.