Updates: Including EU destabilisation, Sudan, and Egypt

Well, one of the problems with social media is that the way the platforms are engineered, they want you to produce content continuously, like all the time. You're supposed to post once, two, three, four, five times a day, regardless of whether you have anything to say. So it just kind of, increases the vapidness of online content on these on these platforms because you're forcing people to put out stuff even when they don't have anything to talk about. So they just have to continuously keep up the chatter regardless of whether or not it's of any importance or significance at all. If I don't have something to say, I'm not gonna put something out.

Like, with the with the situation with Europe, for example. I put out several videos talking about what I believe is actually happening with the war in Ukraine and why the war in Ukraine is happening. Well, specifically, there's the war in Ukraine, and then there's the West's response to the war in Ukraine. And what I'm actually talking about is the West's response to the war in Ukraine engineered by led by directed by The United States. Because that response is an irrational response if your desired outcome was a resolution of the conflict in Ukraine.

That's clearly not what they're interested in. And they've made and there have been several peace attempts that the West has blocked. So, you know, there's the war in Ukraine, which was, you know, an an an illegal invasion by Russia of Ukraine in response to provocation. The provocation was illegal, and the response was illegal, but it is what it is. But then there's the response to that invasion, which has a completely different objective.

And in my opinion, the objective is the destabilization of Europe, as I've said many times. And I've done a number of videos updating the progress, for lack of a better word, in the destabilization of Europe, specifically focusing on Germany and the destabilization and de industrialization of Germany, and the trajectory of that. Because obviously if you want to destabilize Europe economically and politically, your main target should be Germany. If you can if you can, undermine Germany, sabotage Germany, destabilize and de industrialize Germany, then Europe will follow. So I've done a number of videos about that, and I've done a number of videos showing that that is what's happening.

And to be honest, I don't really feel inclined to just continuously repeat myself. As I see the the, advancement of that destabilization program, progressing, I can point out things that are happening. But the reason why those things are happening, I've already stated. So I I feel like I don't feel you know, even though social media encourages you to be repetitive and to just say the same things over and over again, like, literally to retweet or to to, repost, posts and tweets and videos and whatever content that you have already done before, literally to just duplicate it and put it they just encourage you to just keep putting it out so that people will see it. I'm not really inclined to do that.

I'm not trying to push my content out in front of people so that I play the social media game of just producing content for no reason just to stay relevant in people's feeds, you know. But I mean, the most the most interesting thing that's happened lately is also in line with what I was talking about since the beginning of the war in Ukraine with regards to Germany, which is that you would see the rise of the far right and nationalism and anti EU sentiment. I've been talking about that for quite a while. And now the latest polling data shows that the AFD or AFD, the alternative for Germany, far right nationalist German party, has become the second strongest party in Germany. That was never the case before.

It's actually number one in many regions of Germany. It's the strongest party in many regions of Germany outside of Berlin. Now the AFD is anti EU. The head of the of of that party just recently said that they would literally call for the dissolution of the EU if they win. The reaction in Germany by by the establishment, you have the you just had the head of intelligence in Germany saying warning Germans not to vote for the AFT because it's Moscow backed.

Right? You know, the next thing is to say that they're terrorists or that they're supporters of terrorism or, you know, that they're Nazis because they don't support Nazis in Ukraine. Far right, nationalistic sentiment, anti EU sentiment is on the rise in Germany precisely because of what's happening. I mean, isn't it's not happening by accident. This is happening by design because you're you're putting pressure on Germany to make it fail.

And German citizens are going to blame the external influences that Germany is obeying, such as the EU, such as The United States. Germany is running out of money. They just said that they're not gonna be able to provide any extra funds to the EU if the EU asks for money because that's the that's the that's the setup. Right? Every member of the EU has to contribute to the EU overall budget.

And Germany is saying, don't have any extra money. Our own national budget, requirements are stretching us to the limit because we've been sending so much money to Ukraine. Because we've been funding so much of this of this conflict in Ukraine, we don't have any extra money on top of our own expenses to help the EU now with its budget. So you see, this is part of destabilizing Europe. You destabilize Germany, you sabotage and undermine Germany, you automatically, you know, sabotage the EU and undermine the EU and cause the EU to be defunded.

Because you're just suctioning off all of the funds to go to Ukraine, which isn't going to Ukraine. It's going to BlackRock. It's going to weapons companies. It's going to going to weapons manufacturers. It's going to, American companies.

So that's happening. What I what I had had talked about over a year ago, a year and a half ago at this point, is in fact taking place. So that's what I see, you know, going on in Europe if I have to give an update. But like I said, I don't really like I don't really feel the need to just repeat and repeat and repeat, what I've said before just because you see it happening now on the ground. And it is happening.

Every indication is that the elites in Europe who are not nationalistic, who are not interested in their nations, and who do not serve the interests of their nations, the elites, the owners and controllers of global financialized capital. They are their own nation and they are serving their own national interests, not the interests of the geographical nation to which they belong because they don't have anything to do with They're not bounded by geographical borders. They're collaborating in the process of the destabilization of Europe, for reasons that I've already explained many times. Now the other thing a lot of people want me to talk about is Sudan. The situation in Sudan is ongoing.

I don't really have any meaningful updates. I see it is still playing out more or less as I had talked about as being one of the possibilities of how it would play out, is that The UAE and Saudi Arabia were backing the RSF to overthrow the government and to become the government. The peace talks in Saudi Arabia, in my opinion, between the government of Sudan and the RSF, have a goal of getting the government to advocate, to give up power. That's their goal. And the government has gotten that message, but they're still trying to work it out.

They're still trying to see if there's any way that they can get backing because the conflict is getting so bad. And that America, along with Russia and China, or co signed at least implicitly The UAE and Saudi Arabia's coup idea project. But as I talked about before, America hedged their bet with the Emiratis and the Sahudis by saying, okay, we will let you try and see if you can successfully overthrow the government in Sudan and install your guy. But if you can't, then we're happy to see Sudan completely fall into chaos and destruction and anarchy and civil war. That's fine with us.

Because The US doesn't have a lot of interest in Sudan. They haven't pursued a lot of investment and a lot of active interest in Sudan. So they don't have much to lose. And their main interest is to ensure that China's interests and Russia's interests in Sudan cannot develop. The UAE and Saudi Arabia have positioned themselves as more or less a neutral manager that can be employed to safeguard everybody's interests.

Russia's interests, China's interests, America's interests. They can all be balanced. And it will all be under UAE and Saudi Arabia. That's, I think, the the way that they've pitched themselves to America and to Russia and China. To Russia and China are not really in a position to have a problem with that.

If they have anyone to help them in that region, they're happy about that. The United States has been building up, especially The UAE for a very long time, to specifically be that for them in the region, in The Middle East and North Africa. To be sort of their management company, to manage American interests in Middle East And North Africa on their behalf. So they built them up as that. They have, been reliable, but their relationship with The United States has become slightly ambiguous and there's been some suspicion that has developed between The United States and UAE because of The UAE now saying, now that we're in a position as managers in the region, we're willing to manage other people's interest, not just yours.

We're willing to manage Russia's interest and China's interests. America didn't build you up to do that. They built you up to manage their interests. But now that you have this ability to manage the interests of other powers, you're offering your services to Russia and China, which The United States doesn't really care for. But at the same time, from a realpolitic perspective, they know that Russia and China are gonna have interests, maybe our best way of of dealing with their competing interests in Africa with us is to have The UAE and Saudi Arabia kind of manage that.

Then we have an inside guy to balance to our advantage their interests in Africa and The Middle East. So they're still on board with that. But like I said, if United States took the position that if you're not able to get your guy in Sudan, then we'll just watch the we'll we'll just burn it. We'll just burn everything. And that's also fine.

Because our main objective is to make sure that Russia and China, at least their interests don't succeed. And at least they can't secure their interests. If we can't secure any interests in Sudan, then we have to at least make sure that Russia and China don't secure their interest in Sudan. And ideally, we can actually escalate and expand the conflict in Sudan to ensure that Russia and China's interest in all of Africa can be undermined. Because if we can't if we can't rely on The UAE and Saudi Arabia and their plan, their management strategy for our Russia and China's interests, then we'll just make sure that nobody's interests get served.

And then we will manage our interests the the old fashioned way through violence. And that's what's been happening because The UAE's guide, the RSF, have failed thus far to achieve what they promised they could, which was the overthrow of the government. They have failed to do that and they underestimated the resistance that the RSF would face. But all all signs indicated at this point that the conflict is is completely spiraling out of control, which is America now activating its the hedge that they had placed on UAE's offer. Now the other thing that happened with regards to Sudan is that you've seen now that The United States is gonna offer or has offered something like a $100,000,000 to Egypt supposedly to help them cope with the influx of Sudanese refugees.

And the EU has offered money and the United Nations has offered money for that same purpose. Now, for The United States that's coming through the United States Agency for International Development, which is, you know, it's it's another sort of CIA affiliated organization for funding projects and building connections and forwarding American foreign policy objectives around the world. That's what their function is. It's like the National Endowment for Democracy, but on the development level. Rather than on sort of the NGO level, it's on the development level.

So it's dealing with businesses a lot. So this money that they're gonna go that's gonna go to Egypt, obviously, that's being managed by USAID, which is going to be doing it in collaboration with the with the Egyptian government, which means of course, it's in collaboration with the Egyptian army. So a very large percentage of that money that's supposed to be going for helping Egypt to cope with the influx of Sudanese refugees, that means providing shelter, providing medical care, education, food, transport, all of these things. Now these are all sectors of the economy that are dominated by army owned companies. The function of the money is to try to shore up American influence in Egypt because they have become very concerned that they're losing influence in Egypt.

They're losing influence in Egypt as Egypt has joined BRICS or has applied to join BRICS. Egypt is doing business now, doing some trade, not using the US dollar. And if Egypt is able to start doing trade not using the US dollar and not using not relying exclusively upon the US currency as the foreign currency reserve, this will make a huge difference to Egypt's economy if they're able to escape dollarization. And they have moved closer to Russia, they moved closer to China. So The US has become concerned about their own level of influence in Egypt.

So the easiest way is to buy some influence through army owned or controlled companies, which you can put under the guise of helping refugees. Because all of the work that they're that they're all of the work that they're supposed to be doing for refugees, all of that work is done by companies that are going to be army owned companies. So that's what that's about. Now, a slightly more ominous, just the buying of influence, that's normal. But there's something slightly more potentially ominous about that, which is we're also going to show Egypt how conflict in Sudan can profit them.

We're gonna show the Egyptian army how conflict in Sudan can profit them. Because we'll keep giving you money the more refu the the more the conflict can expand and intensify in Sudan, obviously the more refugees there will be, the more justification we will have for sending you billions of dollars to support refugees. This could represent The United States trying to buy Egypt's collaboration in the destabilization of Africa, not just Sudan. But they're trying to recruit Egypt into, broadening, expanding, intensifying, escalating the conflict in Sudan so that it can expand throughout North Africa. That's a potentially ominous thing that's that that that money for Sudanese refugees could indicate, in my opinion.